[yocto] u-boot recipe: Missing dependencies
Burton, Ross
ross.burton at intel.com
Mon Oct 9 03:30:09 PDT 2017
On 8 October 2017 at 18:04, Eric Schwarz <eas at sw-optimization.com> wrote:
> Don't _append when you can just extend the assignment above.
>>
>
> I just did it that way for the moment since I wanted to circumvent merge
> conflicts when I upgrade the underlying recipes from openembedded.
Well it's ugly, so if you want a patch in oe-core then don't introduce ugly
for your convenience.
> Depending on python-native does nothing as the binary isn't in $PATH still.
>>
>
> I thought any Yocto native binaries built are in the PATH automatically. -
> How
> to fix this/do it correctly?
>
You need to inherit python3native, as python (and some others) are opt-in.
> Can you provide a configuration to make U-Boot build on x86 for testing?
>>
>
> I put now some patches in ordered manner on top of the original recipes
> from
> openembedded.
> However, before sending I would like to fix two issues so the recipes can
> go
> into mainline immediately.
>
> 1.) I am working w/ -morty Yocto branch at the moment. The 'u-boot.inc'
> from
> openembedded does not work w/ -morty.
> I get the following error "AttributeError: module 'bb.utils' has no
> attribute 'filter'". Building w/ the original -morty 'u-boot.inc'
> works.
>
Yes, bb.utils.filter() is a new function that isn't in morty.
Ross
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20171009/fe221c7e/attachment.html>
More information about the yocto
mailing list