[yocto] KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE not used anywhere
Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfield at windriver.com
Thu Nov 9 06:13:55 PST 2017
On 2017-11-09 8:11 AM, Alan Martinovic wrote:
> What is your kernel recipe ? Something you wrote, or something
> from a vendor ?
>
>
> Something I inherited.
> It does seem to have been based on linux-yocto-custom.bb
> <http://linux-yocto-custom.bb>.
>
>
> SECTION = "kernel"
> DESCRIPTION = "Mainline Linux kernel"
> LICENSE = "GPLv2"
> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d7810fab7487fb0aad327b76f1be7cd7"
>
> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(senic-hub-beta|senic-hub)"
>
> inherit kernel
> require recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc
>
> KBRANCH = "senic/4.13"
> SRCREV = "e469b218af6fe7cb8c50c4395ae9f3204f8033ae"
>
> PV = "4.13+git${SRCPV}"
> S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
>
> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_senic-hub-beta="senic_defconfig"
>
> SRC_URI =
> "git://github.com/TheMeaningfulEngineer/senic-os-linux.git;nobranch=1;protocol=git;branch=${KBRANCH}
> <http://github.com/TheMeaningfulEngineer/senic-os-linux.git;nobranch=1;protocol=git;branch=${KBRANCH}>
> \
> "
>
>
> Running it with:
>
> bitbake -v linux-senic
>
>
> It fails with:
>
> ERROR: linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 do_kernel_configme:
> Could not configure senic-hub-beta-standard
> ERROR: linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 do_kernel_configme:
> Function failed: do_kernel_configme (log file is located at
> /home/alan/senic-o
> s/build/tmp-glibc/work/senic_hub_beta-senic-linux-gnueabi/linux-senic/4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0/temp/log.do_kernel_configme.5641)
>
> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in:
> /home/alan/senic-os/build/tmp-glibc/work/senic_hub_beta-senic-linux-gnueabi/linux-senic/4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b2
> 18af-r0/temp/log.do_kernel_configme.5641
>
>
> Not sure when "-standard" got appended...?
That's just part of the localversion processing in the bbclass, so
no worries there.
> A more exact error seems to be:
>
> linux-senic-4.13+gitAUTOINC+e469b218af-r0 do_kernel_configme: +
> configs=[ERROR]: no configuration queue found in outdir (.kernel-meta)
>
> Could it be expecting a "linux-yocto style" with the meta branches?
>
Nope. Well, you do need some sort of configuration available, but it
doesn't have to be in that format.
That error is indicating that no configuration was found (no defconfig
or fragments).
A couple more questions, and I can probably sort this out.
- what branch/release of yocto are you using ?
- can you try just using: KBUILD_DEFCONFIG="senic_defconfig"
For that second one, I'm wondering if the variable expansion is not
working with the machine override.
.. and finally, the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG processing is meant to pick
up in-tree defconfigs for use in the build, so whatever you reference
must bein in arch/<your arch>/configs/<kbuild defconfig> .. so make
sure that is the case with senic_defconfig.
You can always add the defconfig directly to the SRC_URI as well
(i.e. copy it into your layer and call it 'defconfig' and add it
to the SRC_URI like any other element.
Bruce
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Bruce Ashfield
> <bruce.ashfield at windriver.com <mailto:bruce.ashfield at windriver.com>> wrote:
>
> On 11/07/2017 08:46 AM, Alan Martinovic wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm trying to get yocto to build the kernel with an in-tree
> defconfig.
> For that I found references to the variable
> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE.
>
> However, I've been experiencing that the kernel is being built with
> some default defconfig, and not the in-tree one that came with the
> kernel and I defined with the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE.
>
> I've looked through all yocto sources for where the
> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE is actually used, and found it only in my
> kernel recipe. So I decided to dissect my recipe.
>
>
> What is your kernel recipe ? Something you wrote, or something
> from a vendor ?
>
>
>
> There is a:
>
> inherit kernel
>
> in my recipe for which, besides others, defines how the kernel
> config
> will be selected.
> Looking at the sources of oe/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass exposes how
> the kernel configuration happens:
>
> kernel_do_configure() {
> # fixes extra + in /lib/modules/2.6.37+
> # $ scripts/setlocalversion . => +
> # $ make kernelversion => 2.6.37
> # $ make kernelrelease => 2.6.37+
> touch ${B}/.scmversion ${S}/.scmversion
>
> if [ "${S}" != "${B}" ] && [ -f "${S}/.config" ] && [ ! -f
> "${B}/.config" ]; then
> mv "${S}/.config" "${B}/.config"
> fi
>
> # Copy defconfig to .config if .config does not exist.
> This allows
> # recipes to manage the .config themselves in
> do_configure_prepend().
> if [ -f "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" ] && [ ! -f
> "${B}/.config" ]; then
> cp "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" "${B}/.config"
> fi
>
> ${KERNEL_CONFIG_COMMAND}
> }
>
>
> I'm planning a workaround by overriding the do_configure in my
> recipe
> to select the correct defconfig from the kernel. It does seem
> however
> like the KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE is exactly here to not have to do
> the workarounds.
>
> Anyone has experiences with successfully using
> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE?
> Is it a specific poky feature (I'm not using poky but specific open
> embedded layers and bitbake)?
>
> That is a feature of kernel-yocto, so if your recipe is inheriting
> kernel-yocto you can use what you are looking for.
>
> But note, in the documentation you are referencing you have to replace
> KMACHINE with your actual machine .. not use the string KMACHINE.
>
> i.e. in your recipe (or bbappend)
>
> # for cases where the KMACHINE (KERNEL MACHINE) and bitbake
> # machine match, just do this:
> KMACHINE=$MACHINE
>
> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_${KMACHINE}="your defconfig"
>
> i.e. it is just a standard bitbake variable with a machine OVERRIDE
> to make it specific to the machine you are building.
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
> Be Well,
> Alan
>
> Ref.
> https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file
> <https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file>
>
>
>
More information about the yocto
mailing list