[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 5/6] libtpm: update to tip.

[Patrick Ohly]

On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 09:12 -0800, Armin Kuster wrote:
> diff --git a/recipes-tpm/libtpm/files/fix_dprintf_issue.patch
> b/recipes-tpm/libtpm/files/fix_dprintf_issue.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..25760bb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/recipes-tpm/libtpm/files/fix_dprintf_issue.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +Upstream-Status: Pending
> +Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808 at gmail.com>

Just wondering: what's your approach regarding "pending" patches? Accept
them into the layer, then submit upstream later as time permits?

Besides that, the six patches are all fine, so please consider them

Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly at intel.com>

However, when I started using these recipes already before the latest
changes, I had to fix quite a few things before the recipes were usable
(will send patches shortly):
- tcsd from trousers doesn't start because of incorrect ownership of 
  /etc/tcsd.conf
- swtpm was more useful for me as a native tool in combination with
  Stefan's qemu-tpm patches, but couldn't be compiled natively
- libtspi.so.1 was not getting installed, causing tpm tools to fail

I had the impression that the recipes were mostly in a "they build" kind
of state, but not really used much in practice. Is that correct?

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.