[yocto] [yocto-kernel-tools][PATCH 0/1] Rework merge of feature branches

[Bruce Ashfield]

On 2017-02-03 03:42 AM, David Vincent wrote:
> On dimanche 29 janvier 2017 23:31:49 CET Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I spent Friday looking into this in more detail, and to keep things
>> consistent
>> with how the path and config queues are handled, with all the tree
>> manipulations
>> pull out of the various scripts and exposed in the bbclass itself, I ended
>> up with
>> a different implementation of the support.
>>
>> The kern-tools change is the same as you did (and is your change), the
>> difference
>> is in the bbclass processing, where do_patch() modifies the tree, and it
>> consumes
>> the output of the meta-data routine .. versus the kgit-meta script itself.
> Thanks for looking into this and come up with a better implementation. I agree
> that mine was a little harsh.
>> The work can be seen in my poky-contrib tree:
>>
>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=zedd/kernel,
>> in the
>> commit "kern-tools: re-enable scc merge command".
>>
>> These changes are on master, and passed my testing to merge feature branches
>> into the branch being built.
> Saw it, read it and saw that it was now in master-next, ready to be pulled.
>>
>> If you are able to try it out (on master), that would be great. I'm going
>> to let it
>> soak for a few days, and once it merges to master, it can be ported to
>> morty.
> Sorry, I don't have a master build ready but as soon as I can test it whether
> on morty or master, I will report back.

Perfect. Since I just sent my kernel series to master, I can flip my
builder to morty and have a look as well. I'd still like to confirm that
it does work in your scenario, but I can do the lifting to get it ready
for morty with a run of my own.

Cheers,

Bruce

>
> David
>