[yocto] Package relation between package.manifest and license.manifest

[Khem Raj]

> On Oct 31, 2016, at 12:54 AM, Hugo Heutinck <heutinck.h at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I am using the Jethro branch, which one are you using ?

morty/master

> 
> For me this provides quite a list of delta's, some seem to be related (e.g. the dbus, dbus-glib, dbus-lib vs. dbus-1),
> but others are not (e.g. expat).
> 
> Was something on license file generation improved between Jethro and more recent branches  ?
> 
> --- /tmp/a.manifest
> +++ /tmp/package.manifest
> @@ -24,9 +24,7 @@
>  cracklib
>  cronie
>  curl
> -dbus
> -dbus-glib
> -dbus-lib
> +dbus-1
>  debianutils
>  debianutils-run-parts
>  diffutils
> @@ -39,26 +37,16 @@
>  ed
>  elfutils
>  ethtool
> -expat
>  factory-tools
>  file
>  findutils
>  firmware-update
>  flex
> -freetype
>  fuser
>  gawk
> -gdbm
> -gdbm-compat
> -glib-2.0
> -glib-2.0-locale-en-gb
> -glibc
>  glibc-binary-localedata-en-gb
>  glibc-binary-localedata-en-us
>  glibc-locale-en-gb
> -gmp
> -gnutls
> -gnutls-openssl
>  grep
>  gzip
>  i2c-tools
> @@ -75,46 +63,70 @@
>  iputils-tracepath
>  iputils-tracepath6
>  iputils-traceroute6
> -json-c
>  kernel-crc-env
>  killall
>  kmod
>  led-control
>  less
> -libacl
> -libattr
> -libbz2
> -libcap
> -libcomerr
> -libcrypto
> -libcurl
> -libdw
> -libe2p
> -libelf
> -libestr
> +libacl1
> +libattr1
> +libblkid1
> +libbz2-0
> +libc6
> +libcap2
> +libcom-err2
> +libcrypto1.0.0
> +libcurl4
> +libdbus-1-3
> +libdbus-glib-1-2
> +libdw1
> +libe2p2
> +libelf1
> +libestr0
>  libevent
> -libext2fs
> -libffi
> -libgcc
> +libexpat1
> +libext2fs2
> +libfdisk1
> +libffi6
> +libfreetype6
> +libgcc1
>  libgcrypt
> -libgpg-error
> -libkmod
> +libgdbm-compat4
> +libgdbm4
> +libglib-2.0-0
> +libglib-2.0-locale-en-gb
> +libgmp10
> +libgnutls-openssl27
> +libgnutls28
> +libgpg-error0
> +libjson-c2
> +libkmod2
>  liblogging
> -liblzma
> -libpci
> -libpcre
> -libpython2
> -libss
> -libssl
> -libstdc++
> -libsysfs
> -libsystemd
> -libudev
> -libwrap
> -libx11
> -libxau
> -libxcb
> -libxdmcp
> +liblzma5
> +libmount1
> +libncurses5
> +libncursesw5
> +libpci3
> +libpcre1
> +libperl5
> +libpopt0
> +libpython2.7-1.0
> +libreadline6
> +libsmartcols1
> +libss2
> +libssl1.0.0
> +libstdc++6
> +libsysfs2
> +libsystemd0
> +libtinfo5
> +libudev1
> +libuuid1
> +libwrap0
> +libx11-6
> +libxau6
> +libxcb1
> +libxdmcp6
> +libz1
>  locale-base-en-gb
>  locale-base-en-us
>  logrotate
> @@ -130,9 +142,6 @@
>  mktemp
>  modutils-initscripts
>  ncurses
> -ncurses-libncurses
> -ncurses-libncursesw
> -ncurses-libtinfo
>  ncurses-terminfo
>  ncurses-terminfo-base
>  net-tools
> @@ -167,8 +176,6 @@
>  pciutils
>  pciutils-ids
>  perl
> -perl-lib
> -popt
>  procps
>  psmisc
>  psplash
> @@ -208,7 +215,6 @@
>  python-unittest
>  python-xml
>  python-xmlrpc
> -readline
>  rsyslog
>  run-postinsts
>  sed
> @@ -232,11 +238,6 @@
>  util-linux
>  util-linux-cfdisk
>  util-linux-fdisk
> -util-linux-libblkid
> -util-linux-libfdisk
> -util-linux-libmount
> -util-linux-libsmartcols
> -util-linux-libuuid
>  util-linux-losetup
>  util-linux-mkfs
>  util-linux-mount
> 
> 
> 2016-10-28 4:25 GMT+02:00 Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com <mailto:raj.khem at gmail.com>>:
> 
>> On Oct 26, 2016, at 5:45 AM, Hugo Heutinck <heutinck.h at gmail.com <mailto:heutinck.h at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Question: What is the relation between the package.manifest and license.manifest ?
>> 
>> After a yocto poky based image has been built there are 2 files in the licenses directory "tmp/deploy/licenses/image_name-datestamp"
>> 
>> One is the package.manifest, which if understood correctly is a list of all packages included in the image.
>> 
>> The second file is the license.manifest, but this one contains besides the package name also the version, recipe name and license of the package.
>> 
>> However if I compare the package names in both lists, there seem to be a  number of packages in the license.manifest that are not part of the package.manifest. E.g. "readline, popt, expat, freetype".
>> 
>> Is the license.manifest a list of all items in the package.manifest + ?build dependencies? or something ?
> 
> They should be same.
> 
> try something like this
> cat license.manifest | grep "PACKAGE NAME: " | sed "s/PACKAGE NAME: //“ > a.manifest
> diff a.manifest package.manifest
> 
> For me both files comes out same.
> 
> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> H.Heutinck
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> yocto mailing list
>> yocto at yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto at yoctoproject.org>
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto>
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20161031/67ec9ee2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20161031/67ec9ee2/attachment.pgp>