[yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors
Khem Raj
raj.khem at gmail.com
Wed Oct 5 09:52:44 PDT 2016
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Dinh Nguyen (dinhn) <dinhn at cisco.com> wrote:
> Many thanks Paul. Your help is greatly appreciated.
>
> 1. >>> Like the other responder I would suggest you not set PACKAGES
>
> Yes, I did not set the PACKAGES, so -dev, -dbg and main packages were built as shown below:
>
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp$ find tmp/deploy | grep c-mlibtmp/deploy/ipk/core2-64/c-mlib-dbg_1.1-r0_core2-64.ipk
> tmp/deploy/ipk/core2-64/c-mlib-dev_1.1-r0_core2-64.ipk
> tmp/deploy/ipk/core2-64/c-mlib_1.1-r0_core2-64.ipk
> tmp/deploy/licenses/c-mlib
>
> 2. >>> FILES_${PN}-dev = "${includedir}”
>
> I added that to .bb as you suggested so .so file doesn't end up in the ${PN}-dev
> Package — No longer see the error mentioned in previous mail. Thx
>
> 3. >>> This is what I suspected would happen - these files would normally be part of
> the ${PN}-dbg package, but since you've removed that from PACKAGES, they are
> ending up unpackaged and that is not allowed.
>
> Did you mean the "install -m 0644 xxx yyy” to remove those files from the PACKAGES? How do I copy .so and binaries from my target to the libdir or bindir?
>
> After changing the .bb to remove the PACKAGES setting and FILES_${PN}-dev = "${includedir}”
> For the very first time, packages were built find, image were created under image directory and c-mlib source is still in the yp workspace as shown below:
>
> A.Packages were built
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp$ find tmp/deploy | grep c-mlib
> tmp/deploy/ipk/core2-64/c-mlib-dbg_1.1-r0_core2-64.ipk
> tmp/deploy/ipk/core2-64/c-mlib-dev_1.1-r0_core2-64.ipk
> tmp/deploy/ipk/core2-64/c-mlib_1.1-r0_core2-64.ipk
> tmp/deploy/licenses/c-mlib
>
> B. Source files and the c-mlib git directory still have all the sources (e.g just grep the mlib_api.c)
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp$ find . -name "mlib_api.c"
> ./tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src/mlib_api.c
> ./tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/c-mlib/1.1-r0/packages-split/c-mlib-dbg/usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src/mlib_api.c
> ./tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/c-mlib/1.1-r0/package/usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src/mlib_api.c
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp$
>
> C. Image was built as well including binaries and libmlib.so
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp/tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/c-mlib/1.1-r0/image/usr/bin$ ls -ltr
> total 1424
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dinhn dinhn 171701 Oct 5 01:17 datamodel_cache
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dinhn dinhn 187434 Oct 5 01:17 invoke
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dinhn dinhn 184961 Oct 5 01:17 invoke_b
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dinhn dinhn 171701 Oct 5 01:17 protocol_infra
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dinhn dinhn 191362 Oct 5 01:17 publisher
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dinhn dinhn 187084 Oct 5 01:17 rpc-register
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dinhn dinhn 179648 Oct 5 01:17 service
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dinhn dinhn 174518 Oct 5 01:17 subscriber
>
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp/tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/c-mlib/1.1-r0/image/usr/bin$ cd ../lib
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp/tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/c-mlib/1.1-r0/image/usr/lib$ ls -ltr
> total 856
> -rw-r--r-- 3 dinhn dinhn 872657 Oct 5 01:17 libmlib.so
>
> So it is all good for the first time, but thereafter that, if I do clean “bitbake -c clean c-mlib” and “bitbake c-mlib” again.
> All packages were build successful, but all data under c-mlib got was gone. Nothing there including .c/h files, image directory etc...
>
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp/tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git$ ls -ltr
> total 0
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp/tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git$
>
> Please give me an idea why how to solve this? Sorry for a long email ;-))
I guess its getting renamed as per debian package renaming rules. Just add
ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = "1"
and see if you get the ipk
>
> Best,
> —Dinh
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10/4/16, 11:55 PM, "Paul Eggleton" <paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 05 Oct 2016 05:12:27 Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>> Thanks much Paul.
>>>
>>> >>>> PACKAGES = "${PN}" should work
>>>
>>> It solved the early error “ c-mlib listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this
>>> leads to packaging errors” — Thanks again.
>>>
>>>
>>> But running into other issue. Below is my do_install
>>>
>>> do_install () {
>>> oe_runmake all
>>> install -d ${D}${libdir}
>>> install -d ${D}${bindir}
>>> install -m 0644 ${S}/target/libmlib.so ${D}${libdir}
>>> install -m 0644 ${S}/target/datamodel_cache ${D}${bindir}
>>> install -m 0644 ${S}/target/invoke ${D}${bindir}
>>> install -m 0644 ${S}/target/invoke_b ${D}${bindir}
>>> install -m 0644 ${S}/target/protocol_infra ${D}${bindir}
>>> install -m 0644 ${S}/target/publisher ${D}${bindir}
>>> install -m 0644 ${S}/target/rpc-register ${D}${bindir}
>>> install -m 0644 ${S}/target/service ${D}${bindir}
>>> install -m 0644 ${S}/target/subscriber ${D}${bindir}
>>> }
>>>
>>> PACKAGES = "${PN}"
>>> FILES_${PN} = "/usr/bin/datamodel_cache \
>>> /usr/bin/invoke \
>>> /usr/bin/invoke_b \
>>> /usr/lib/libmlib.so \
>>> /usr/bin/protocol_infra \
>>> /usr/bin/publisher \
>>> /usr/bin/rpc-register \
>>> /usr/bin/service \
>>> /usr/bin/subscriber"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And under ${S}/target, it has the libmlib.so and other binaries built,
>>> And I intended to copy the .so to ${D}${libdir} and binarires to
>>> ${D}${bindir}. I am able to build the c-mlib package as shown below:
>>
>>> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp$ find
>>> tmp/deploy | grep c-mlib
>>> tmp/deploy/ipk/core2-64/c-mlib_1.1-r0_core2-64.ipk
>>>
>>>
>>> The problem is that, after "bitbake c-mlib”, it moved all sources under ${S}
>>> to /usr/src/debug etc..
>>> I googled but unable to find the root cause.
>>> Would you and other can help to identify the issue?
>>> NOTE: Executing RunQueue Tasks
>>> ERROR: QA Issue: c-mlib: Files/directories were installed but not shipped
>>> /usr/src
>>> /usr/lib/.debug
>>> /usr/lib/.debug/libmlib.so
>>> /usr/src/debug
>>> /usr/src/debug/c-mlib
>>> /usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0
>>> /usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git
>>> /usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src
>>> /usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/include
>>> /usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/deps
>>> /usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src/mlib_api.c
>>> /usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src/mlib_metrics.c
>>> /usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src/mlib_util.c
>>> /usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src/mlib_local_metrics.c
>>> /usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src/dslink_bindings
>>> /usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src/utils
>>> /usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src/service_sdk
>>> /usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src/dslink_bindings/mlib_service_cache.c
>>> /usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src/dslink_bindings/mlib_wrapper.c
>>> /usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src/dslink_bindings/mlib_dsa.c
>>> /usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src/dslink_bindings/include
>>> ….
>>
>>This is what I suspected would happen - these files would normally be part of
>>the ${PN}-dbg package, but since you've removed that from PACKAGES, they are
>>ending up unpackaged and that is not allowed.
>>
>>Like the other responder I would suggest you not set PACKAGES - instead you
>>just need to take steps so that the .so file doesn't end up in the ${PN}-dev
>>package. You could do something like this:
>>
>>FILES_${PN}-dev = "${includedir}"
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Paul
>>
>>--
>>
>>Paul Eggleton
>>Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> --
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
More information about the yocto
mailing list