[yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors
Lennart Sorensen
lsorense at csclub.uwaterloo.ca
Wed Oct 5 09:30:20 PDT 2016
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 04:06:25PM +0000, Dinh Nguyen (dinhn) wrote:
> Many thanks Paul. Your help is greatly appreciated.
>
> 1. >>> Like the other responder I would suggest you not set PACKAGES
>
> Yes, I did not set the PACKAGES, so -dev, -dbg and main packages were built as shown below:
>
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp$ find tmp/deploy | grep c-mlibtmp/deploy/ipk/core2-64/c-mlib-dbg_1.1-r0_core2-64.ipk
> tmp/deploy/ipk/core2-64/c-mlib-dev_1.1-r0_core2-64.ipk
> tmp/deploy/ipk/core2-64/c-mlib_1.1-r0_core2-64.ipk
> tmp/deploy/licenses/c-mlib
>
> 2. >>> FILES_${PN}-dev = "${includedir}”
>
> I added that to .bb as you suggested so .so file doesn't end up in the ${PN}-dev
> Package — No longer see the error mentioned in previous mail. Thx
>
> 3. >>> This is what I suspected would happen - these files would normally be part of
> the ${PN}-dbg package, but since you've removed that from PACKAGES, they are
> ending up unpackaged and that is not allowed.
>
> Did you mean the "install -m 0644 xxx yyy” to remove those files from the PACKAGES? How do I copy .so and binaries from my target to the libdir or bindir?
>
> After changing the .bb to remove the PACKAGES setting and FILES_${PN}-dev = "${includedir}”
> For the very first time, packages were built find, image were created under image directory and c-mlib source is still in the yp workspace as shown below:
>
> A.Packages were built
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp$ find tmp/deploy | grep c-mlib
> tmp/deploy/ipk/core2-64/c-mlib-dbg_1.1-r0_core2-64.ipk
> tmp/deploy/ipk/core2-64/c-mlib-dev_1.1-r0_core2-64.ipk
> tmp/deploy/ipk/core2-64/c-mlib_1.1-r0_core2-64.ipk
> tmp/deploy/licenses/c-mlib
>
> B. Source files and the c-mlib git directory still have all the sources (e.g just grep the mlib_api.c)
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp$ find . -name "mlib_api.c"
> ./tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src/mlib_api.c
> ./tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/c-mlib/1.1-r0/packages-split/c-mlib-dbg/usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src/mlib_api.c
> ./tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/c-mlib/1.1-r0/package/usr/src/debug/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git/src/mlib_api.c
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp$
>
> C. Image was built as well including binaries and libmlib.so
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp/tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/c-mlib/1.1-r0/image/usr/bin$ ls -ltr
> total 1424
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dinhn dinhn 171701 Oct 5 01:17 datamodel_cache
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dinhn dinhn 187434 Oct 5 01:17 invoke
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dinhn dinhn 184961 Oct 5 01:17 invoke_b
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dinhn dinhn 171701 Oct 5 01:17 protocol_infra
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dinhn dinhn 191362 Oct 5 01:17 publisher
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dinhn dinhn 187084 Oct 5 01:17 rpc-register
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dinhn dinhn 179648 Oct 5 01:17 service
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dinhn dinhn 174518 Oct 5 01:17 subscriber
>
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp/tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/c-mlib/1.1-r0/image/usr/bin$ cd ../lib
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp/tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/c-mlib/1.1-r0/image/usr/lib$ ls -ltr
> total 856
> -rw-r--r-- 3 dinhn dinhn 872657 Oct 5 01:17 libmlib.so
>
> So it is all good for the first time, but thereafter that, if I do clean “bitbake -c clean c-mlib” and “bitbake c-mlib” again.
> All packages were build successful, but all data under c-mlib got was gone. Nothing there including .c/h files, image directory etc...
>
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp/tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git$ ls -ltr
> total 0
> dinhn at rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp/tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git$
>
> Please give me an idea why how to solve this? Sorry for a long email ;-))
Are the files present in the image/packages? Maybe it is just the
bitbake cache skipping doing work it already did last time.
--
Len Sorensen
More information about the yocto
mailing list