[yocto] Master or master-next?

[Burton, Ross]

On 15 March 2016 at 22:56, Chris Tapp <opensource at keylevel.com> wrote:

> Should I use master or master-next to track 2.1 release progress?
>

master-next is a guideline of what's due to be merged shortly but patches
will be re-ordered, rebased, partially merged or dropped from it, so only
do that if you're sure.  And double-check that master-next is in fact a
direct child of master (or whatever the correct terminology for git is).
At the moment, master is newer than master-next and rebasing -next onto
master shows that it contains just two patches that are known to be broken
right now.

Ross
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20160316/53a28ccb/attachment.html>