[yocto] Master or master-next?

[Chris Tapp]

> On 15 Mar 2016, at 23:05, Christopher Larson <kergoth at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:56 PM Chris Tapp <opensource at keylevel.com <mailto:opensource at keylevel.com>> wrote:
> Should I use master or master-next to track 2.1 release progress?
> 
> master-next is rebased. I wouldn't recommend using it unless you need to test something specific which is on that branch and isn't yet on master, otherwise I'd wait for changes to hit master. master is volatile enough at times ;)

Thanks. Just working through an “introspection” message as we speak ;-)

Just seeing where I’m at so I can jump when 2.1 is released :-)

--

Chris Tapp
opensource at keylevel.com
www.keylevel.com

----
You can tell you're getting older when your car insurance gets real cheap!

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20160315/9470e495/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20160315/9470e495/attachment.pgp>