[yocto] Shorter build time?

[Daniel.]

The only task that I see taking really long is the do_rootfs. And I
think that it takes that long because disks are slooow :)

2016-07-04 20:14 GMT-03:00 Takashi Matsuzawa <tmatsuzawa at uievolution.com>:
> By the way, PyPy seems to have some restriction that is not fully compatible
> with CPyhon and bitbake scripts may not run as they are.  I tried it
> yesterday and learned that it is not a simple in-place replacement.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Burton, Ross <ross.burton at intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 3:50 AM
> To: Marcelo E. Magallon
> Cc: Takashi Matsuzawa; yocto at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [yocto] Shorter build time?
>
>
> On 4 July 2016 at 19:10, Marcelo E. Magallon <marcelo.magallon at hpe.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> That is true, but I've seen cases where the start up time of Python (or
>> the time it takes bitbake to start "doing work") is *perceptually* much
>> larger than the work done by the recipe, or at least it looks like it
>> represents a sigficant fraction of the total work. That's where PyPy
>> might help.
>
>
> Measuring that overhead should be fairly simple, and if it's true then
> having a pool of workers would be a good optimisation.
>
> Ross
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>



-- 
"Do or do not. There is no try"
  Yoda Master