[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] linux-raspberrypi: Adjust for libexecdir changes

Anders Darander anders at chargestorm.se
Wed Feb 24 12:28:24 PST 2016


* Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony at googlemail.com> [160223 22:38]:
> > * Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> [160130 18:07]:
> >
> >> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi.inc b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi.inc
> >> index 70e8bfe..0798788 100644
> >> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi.inc
> >> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi.inc
> >> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ do_rpiboot_mkimage() {
> >>      if test "x${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}" != "xuImage" ; then
> >>          if test -n "${KERNEL_DEVICETREE}"; then
> >>              # Add RPi bootloader trailer to kernel image to enable DeviceTree support
> >> -            ${STAGING_DIR_NATIVE}/usr/lib/rpi-mkimage/mkknlimg --dtok ${KERNEL_OUTPUT} ${KERNEL_OUTPUT}
> >> +            ${STAGING_DIR_NATIVE}${libexecdir}/mkknlimg --dtok ${KERNEL_OUTPUT} ${KERNEL_OUTPUT}
> >>          fi
> >>      fi
> >>  }
> This patch is mandatory but there was a serial with additional fixes
> send by Maciej Borzecki on Feb 2nd. I think this is worth taken into
> account.
> 

Yes, that's right.

If the rest of the patches in that series is non-controversial, could we
have them applied? Otherwise, could we have Khem's patch applied, and
the other series rebased upon that?

We've had the master branch non-building for quite a while now...

I'm just keen to get either of those patches applied to
meta-raspberrypi. I'd like to avoid having to use a local fork as much
as possible... 

Cheers,
Anders

-- 
Anders Darander, Senior System Architect
ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB



More information about the yocto mailing list