[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCH] cleanup and restart crashed vnc server

[Randle, William C]

On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 17:12 +0100, Joshua G Lock wrote:
On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 16:09 +0000, Randle, William C wrote:
On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 16:59 +0100, Joshua G Lock wrote:

On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 17:09 -0700, Bill Randle wrote:


Use a common script to check for a running vnc server, and if not
running
cleanup dangling lock files and restart the server.

[YOCTO #8210]

Signed-off-by: Bill Randle <william.c.randle at intel.com<mailto:william.c.randle at intel.com>>
---
 bin/checkvnc                                                   | 10
++++++++++
 .../site-packages/autobuilder/buildsteps/RunESDKSanityTests.py |  3
+--
 .../site-packages/autobuilder/buildsteps/RunOeSelftest.py      |  3
+--
 .../site-packages/autobuilder/buildsteps/RunSDKSanityTests.py  |  3
+--
 .../site-packages/autobuilder/buildsteps/RunSanityTests.py     |  3
+--
 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 bin/checkvnc

diff --git a/bin/checkvnc b/bin/checkvnc
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..574ba48
--- /dev/null
+++ b/bin/checkvnc
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+#
+# check if vnc server is running, and if not, cleanup and restart
+#
+pid=$(pidof Xvnc)
+if [[ $? != 0 ]]; then
+    echo "Xvnc not running, attempting restart"
+    vncserver -kill :1
+    vncserver



The vncserver is currently started with `vncserver :1`, whereas this
script just calls `vncserver` — is that intentional/desirable?

Would it be a little cleaner/more robust if we didn't assume only one
Xvnc instance was running and instead write the pid of the process we
start to a file and use that file to check the status?

Regards,

Joshua



The vncserver program is a shell script and uses :1 as the default display.

The pid of Xvnc is written to a file already. The problem is, if Xvmc crashes, the pid file (and lock file) are left around, so just looking at the pid file existance, you can't tell if it's actually running or not.

Can we read the pid from the pidfile and do the tidy up if the process isn't running? My main concern here is that we assume only a single instance of Xvnc is running, I'm not sure if that is a safe assumption to make?


I'll take a look at it. You can hold off merging this one for now.

    -Bill

Thanks,

Joshua



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20160818/e546b026/attachment.html>