[yocto] [oe] Question about IMAGE_INSTALL_append and CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL

[Victor Rodriguez]

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Paul Eggleton
<paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 July 2015 14:51:55 Victor Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Leonardo Sandoval
>>
>> <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > On 07/21/2015 10:45 AM, Victor Rodriguez wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Gary Thomas <gary at mlbassoc.com> wrote:
>> >>> On 2015-07-21 09:26, Victor Rodriguez wrote:
>> >>>> Hi team
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I have a question , according to documentation there is a difference
>> >>>> between
>> >>>>
>> >>>> IMAGE_INSTALL_append
>> >>>>
>> >>>> and
>> >>>>
>> >>>> CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Specifies the list of packages to be added to the image. You should
>> >>>> only set this variable in the local.conf configuration file found in
>> >>>> the Build Directory.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> When I use the second one and try to build a core-image-minimal-xfce
>> >>>> bitbake does not install what I wanted in my image . I had a really
>> >>>> hard time few weekends ago because of this.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I wonder If I am missing something or if this is a bug
>> >>>
>> >>> The core-image-minimal-xfce recipe does not "play nice" with
>> >>> the core-image class and is not respecting CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL.
>> >>>
>> >>> I think this should be filed as a bug (and feel free to suggest a patch)
>> >>>
>> >>> BTW, this question should really be on the OpenEmbedded development
>> >>> list.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks Gary
>> >>
>> >> I will submit the BUG , do you know the Bugzila where I should submit it
>> >> ?
>> >
>> > Victor, you can file a bug at https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org
>>
>> I think we have one already
>>
>> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7616
>
> That's not the right bug.
>
> If the suggestion is that core-image-minimal-xfce needs to be fixed, that's not
> a bug we would track in the Yocto Project bugzilla (since the Yocto Project is
> not actively involved in maintaining meta-xfce).
>
> Cheers,
> Paul

Hi Paul

Where can I track this ?


> --
>
> Paul Eggleton
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre