[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] RFC on choice of tool for patch review
Joshua Lock
joshua.lock at collabora.co.uk
Wed Aug 12 02:45:40 PDT 2015
On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 10:25 +0100, Joshua Lock wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 10:17 +0100, Alex J Lennon wrote:
> > We've been having a discussion on a way forward to manage patches
> > and
> > code review and would like to open this up for discussion to agree
> > a
> > way
> > forward.
>
> There's http://patchwork.openembedded.org/. I'm not sure who
> maintains
> it, nor if anyone uses it, but patches sent to the mailing list end
> up
> there.
>
> OOI who are "we" in this context? What benefits would a change bring?
I managed to miss both the [yocto] and [meta-raspberrypi] tags on this
mail, apologies for that. I guess that "we" are the meta-raspberrypi
maintainers.
Still, the patchwork instance may be an option? The meta-freescale
layers appear to be using it.
Cheers,
Joshua
More information about the yocto
mailing list