[yocto] [meta-cgl][PATCH 0/2] cosmetic updates

[Alexandru Vaduva]

I am able to discuss patches and I already collected your patches, 
but unfortunately I cannot yet take any decision about them or 
about the next apps to be included and bugs to be fixed because 
those decisions will be taken after the Linux distro release (in a few days).


Alex

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe MacDonald [mailto:joe at deserted.net] 
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:13 PM
To: Alexandru Vaduva
Cc: Valentin Cobelea; yocto at yoctoproject.org; Daniel Bornaz; Adrian Dudau; Maxin John
Subject: Re: [meta-cgl][PATCH 0/2] cosmetic updates

Hey Alex,

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Alexandru Vaduva <Alexandru.Vaduva at enea.com> wrote:
> For the moment we are preparing a release for Enea Linux, and we are fully booked.
> After the release we will try to make all the needed steps for the meta-cgl layer:
> That means proper information about the layers, maintainers and put in place all the needed procedures.
> All this information will be made publically available.
>
> Thanks for your interest Joe, I personally agree with your suggestions, hope to continue the collaboration.

Okay.  So should I interpret that to mean that you're not currently interested in patches against the meta-cgl layer at git://git.enea.com/linux/meta-cgl?  I understand the realities of scheduling a release of a Linux distro, but if you are still able to collect and discuss / merge changes, I'll continue to kick the tires a bit.

-J.

>
>
> Alex
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe MacDonald [mailto:joe at deserted.net]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 5:11 AM
> To: Valentin Cobelea; Alexandru Vaduva
> Cc: yocto at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: [meta-cgl][PATCH 0/2] cosmetic updates
>
> I'm just taking a look now at meta-cgl and gearing up to do some submissions to it.  I've been working from:
>
>    git://git.enea.com/linux/meta-cgl
>
> which hasn't seen much activity recently, but it seems to still be the authoritative source.  I apologize if I'm working from an out-of-date tree.
>
> For starters, if I could make a request, any chance we could get the 
> README file updated with instructions on where you'd like to see 
> patches go, so I don't unnecessarily spam the list?  :-)
>
> -J.



--
Joe MacDonald
:wq