[yocto] are there any more obvious candidates for ASSUME_PROVIDED?
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Fri Jul 25 05:39:14 PDT 2014
asked about this once upon a time ... are there any other
possibilities for adding to ASSUME_PROVIDED in local.conf.sample,
given that there are surely more native utilities that are fairly safe
by now?
for example, it's still weird that current default ASSUME_PROVIDED
includes bzip2 but not gzip, especially since the quick start guide:
https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.html
lists *both* of them as required on your build host.
it also seems odd that that list includes git but not subversion.
anyway, you get the idea.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
More information about the yocto
mailing list