[yocto] parallel build of multiple machine/os?

[Mike Looijmans]

On 12/10/2014 08:00 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> On Dec 10, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Koehler, Yannick (HP Networking) <yannick.koehler at hp.com> wrote:
>>
>> Can Yocto build for example in a single bitbake call an image for x86, ppc, arm, others?  Or is the call to bitbake limited to a single architecture?  And if so, how?
>>
>> I see that lots of *-native package are built, and I guess is that for each machine/os those would be reused, as such, it appears it would be a benefit to be able to build multiple package version for different architecture/distro/machine in a single invocation of bitbake.
>
> parallel multi-machine builds have been discussed but not thought of worth doing. you could however share
> lot of common packages among machines sequentially.
>
> [...]

A more convincing use-case for multi-machine building is the emerging of 
"hybrids". The little/big architecture that puts different versions of ARM 
CPUs into a single machine is one example, the OMAPs with the DSP and PRUs are 
another. Boards with FPGAs can have several CPU architectures running on a 
single board. One could imagine that one would want to build the software for 
all these subsystems in a single call, and that one bitbake process would be 
managing that the build system gets properly used.

Currently, these hybrids have to invoke bitbake for each subsystem, probably 
needlessly regenerating binaries, and once more for the one image to find them 
all and in darkness bind them...


Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards,

Mike Looijmans
System Expert


TOPIC Embedded Systems
Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: (+31) (0) 499 33 69 79
Telefax:  (+31) (0) 499 33 69 70
E-mail: mike.looijmans at topic.nl
Website: www.topic.nl

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

Topic zoekt gedreven (embedded) software specialisten!
http://topic.nl/vacatures/topic-zoekt-software-engineers/