[yocto] [PATCH 0/2] Add some recipes

[Joe MacDonald]

[Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2] Add some recipes] On 14.12.02 (Tue 14:49) Bruce Ashfield wrote:

> On 14-12-02 02:37 PM, Joe MacDonald wrote:
> >[Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2] Add some recipes] On 14.12.02 (Tue 14:03) Alexandru Vaduva wrote:
> >
> >>Hello Bian,
> >>
> >>Did you know that the multipath tools recipe was also available inside the
> >>meta-oe and meta-virtualization?
> >>I do not have any problems with it being available in meta-cgl.  I just wanted
> >>to hear other opinions because I would like to make sure we do not get to that
> >>point where we keep various versions of various recipes in a variety of places.
> >>It will be a nightmare to work with them in the future.
> >
> >I completely agree, and I that's mostly the consensus of the community.
> >Since meta-cgl already has dependencies on both meta-virtualization and
> >meta-oe, I think it makes the most sense to try to keep updates for the
> >multipath recipes in one or both of those layers.  My recommendation
> >would be to update the meta-oe one as it has broader applicability, but
> >of course that's up to the submitter and the layer maintainers to
> >decide.  It may be that it's appropriate to maintain a bbappend for the
> >recipe in meta-cgl, but I think it'd be good to send it for inclusion in
> >meta-oe first.
> 
> I'm with Joe on this one.
> 
> I only did a really quick check on the history of the two copies
> that we have, but I see the meta-virt variant was added in January 2013
> and what could be the first version in meta-oe in March the same year.

I actually intended to say "update the meta-oe one as it has broader
applicability and if you're feeling ambitious, send the same update to
meta-virtualization" since I thought meta-virt didn't have dependencies
on meta-oe and I can see an argument in favour of keeping a separate
recipe if you're keeping the layer contained.  But it looks like that's
not the case, so consolidation makes sense here.

> The layer index may not have been as helpful back then (but honestly
> I can't recall) .. either way we failed to coordinate as a wider community
> and managed to end up with two different recipes in the layers.
> 
> There's no sense making this any worse than it already is, so I'd say
> that we could spend the time looking at the two (three?) recipes, and
> get a consolidated variant in meta-oe, and I'd be happy to drop the
> one in meta-virtualization and bbappend the same way that Joe suggests.
> 
> Thoughts ? We should figure out if someone is going to take a crack
> at it, so we don't all go do the same thing :)

It's not on my to-do list, so don't worry about me running in parallel.
iscsi was (and is again) the only meta-networking one and libcap-ng (as
discussed with Armin the other day) and swig are the meta-selinux ones.

-J.

> 
> Bruce
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >Just my thoughts on it.
> >-J.
> >
> >>Once again, just to make it clear. I am ok with the patches, I will merge all
> >>three of them (corosync, multipath and drbd) but I just wanted to make sure you
> >>took this into consideration.
> >>Also I like the idea of having drbd recipe inside and the fact that you like to
> >>get involved in this initiative.
> >>Hope to hear more from you and also that I will be able to help more.
> >>
> >>
> >>Alex Vaduva
> >>
> >>
> >>On Tuesday, December 2, 2014 10:07 AM, Bian Naimeng <biannm at cn.fujitsu.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>Bian Naimeng (2):
> >>   [meta-cgl] device-mapper-multipath: add recipe
> >>   [meta-cgl]drbd: add recipe
> >>
> >>.../device-mapper-multipath/multipathd.init.patch  | 12 +++++
> >>.../device-mapper-multipath_0.5.0.bb              | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >>meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/drbd/drbd/drbd.service | 12 +++++
> >>meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/drbd/drbd_8.4.4.bb    | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>4 files changed, 134 insertions(+)
> >>create mode 100644 meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/device-mapper-multipath/
> >>device-mapper-multipath/multipathd.init.patch
> >>create mode 100644 meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/device-mapper-multipath/
> >>device-mapper-multipath_0.5.0.bb
> >>create mode 100644 meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/drbd/drbd/drbd.service
> >>create mode 100644 meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/drbd/drbd_8.4.4.bb
> >>
> >>--
> >>1.9.1
> >>
> >>--
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>yocto mailing list
> >>yocto at yoctoproject.org
> >>https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> 

-- 
-Joe MacDonald.
:wq
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20141202/3bccc7b2/attachment.pgp>