[yocto] CGL compliance layer initiative

[Vali Cobelea]

Hi Diego,

Thank you for your interest in the meta-cgl layer.
Please be aware that the layer is in its alpha state, as I said an 
initiative that started with a layer.

The branch is 'master', no custom things yet.
Below you can find the instructions to clone all of the "dependency layers":

git clonegit://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-qt3 
<http://twiki.enea.se/twiki/bin/edit/Git://git/yoctoproject/org/Meta-qt3?topicparent=EETeng.EneaLinuxCGLBuildInstructions;nowysiwyg=0>
git clonegit://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-virtualization 
<http://twiki.enea.se/twiki/bin/edit/Git://git/yoctoproject/org/Meta-virtualization?topicparent=EETeng.EneaLinuxCGLBuildInstructions;nowysiwyg=0>
git clonegit://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-selinux 
<http://twiki.enea.se/twiki/bin/edit/Git://git/yoctoproject/org/Meta-selinux?topicparent=EETeng.EneaLinuxCGLBuildInstructions;nowysiwyg=0>
git clonegit://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-cloud-services 
<http://twiki.enea.se/twiki/bin/edit/Git://git/yoctoproject/org/Meta-cloud-services?topicparent=EETeng.EneaLinuxCGLBuildInstructions;nowysiwyg=0>
git clonegit://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-security 
<http://twiki.enea.se/twiki/bin/edit/Git://git/yoctoproject/org/Meta-security?topicparent=EETeng.EneaLinuxCGLBuildInstructions;nowysiwyg=0>
git clonehttps://github.com/joaohf/meta-openclovis.git

Also, since there are duplicated recipes in these layers, please add the 
following BBMASK in cong/local.conf  (big thank you to Alex Vaduva for 
this):

BBMASK = 
"meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack/recipes-support/lvm2|meta-security/recipes-security/libcap-ng"


Let me know how the test goes Deigo.


Best regards,
Vali

On 04/11/2014 12:35 AM, Diego Sueiro wrote:
>
> Vali,
>
> I'm excited to see CGL support for Yocto.
> I'm going to test this layer as soon as possible.
>
> One question, which branch of Yocto is it based on?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> *dS
> Diego Sueiro
> sent from mobile.
>
> On Apr 9, 2014 11:05 AM, "Vali Cobelea" <valentin.cobelea at enea.com 
> <mailto:valentin.cobelea at enea.com>> wrote:
>
>     OK Paul, that indeed makes sense, I really did not knew that
>     preliminary versions of layers are accepted.
>     I will discuss around here and if everything goes OK we will start
>     the move in the "public" layer index.
>     I also do agree with an all-together strategy, no matter for the
>     layer state.
>
>
>     Much appreciated,
>     Vali
>
>
>     On 04/09/2014 02:01 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>
>         On Wednesday 09 April 2014 13:55:47 Vali Cobelea wrote:
>
>             On 04/09/2014 01:51 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>
>                 On Tuesday 08 April 2014 18:34:08 Vali Cobelea wrote:
>
>                     Here at ENEA we decided to take the initiative
>                     regarding the CGL
>                     compliance when it comes to the Yocto Project.
>                     For this we started the work on a dedicated layer
>                     called 'meta-cgl'
>
>                     which can be accessed / cloned from here:
>                     http://git.enea.com/git/?p=linux/meta-cgl.git
>                         git clone git at git.enea.com:linux/meta-cgl
>
>                     Have a look of the things we got there so far,
>                     please remember that
>                     there is still plenty of work to be done (layer
>                     architecture, CGL
>                     requirements coverage mode and so on).
>                     It is a little bit more than a stub layer,
>                     consider it a starting point
>                     for the direction we would like to have with this
>                     layer.
>
>                     Any input is much appreciated, lets keep the
>                     discussion by this email
>                     thread and see where it goes.
>
>                 I don't have anything to offer on the layer contents,
>                 but I would say in
>                 order to make it easy for people to find this layer I
>                 would strongly
>                 encourage you to>
>                 submit it to the OpenEmbedded layer index:
>                 http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/submit/
>
>             Thank you for the input.
>             We will keep the layer for a short period of time at the
>             current
>             location while getting other ideas regarding the content /
>             architecture.
>             The layer initiative will also be raised up in the board
>             advisory
>             meeting, in order to get even more input.
>             After which we will make it easier to find, access and use
>             for anyone,
>             exactly as you suggested.
>
>         OK, as the maintainer it's totally up to you.
>
>         I would say though generally that I'd like to see more people
>         adding their
>         work-in-progress layers to the layer index, even if at some
>         time later they
>         will be moved elsewhere or absorbed into another layer - it
>         just makes it
>         easier to point people to the layer index so they can find
>         recipes that have
>         already been written, rather than having to re-write them from
>         scratch.
>
>         Cheers,
>         Paul
>
>
>     -- 
>     _______________________________________________
>     yocto mailing list
>     yocto at yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto at yoctoproject.org>
>     https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20140411/0f14d619/attachment.html>