[yocto] CGL compliance layer initiative

[Diego Sueiro]

Vali,

I'm excited to see CGL support for Yocto.
I'm going to test this layer as soon as possible.

One question, which branch of Yocto is it based on?

Regards,

--
*dS
Diego Sueiro
sent from mobile.
On Apr 9, 2014 11:05 AM, "Vali Cobelea" <valentin.cobelea at enea.com> wrote:

> OK Paul, that indeed makes sense, I really did not knew that preliminary
> versions of layers are accepted.
> I will discuss around here and if everything goes OK we will start the
> move in the "public" layer index.
> I also do agree with an all-together strategy, no matter for the layer
> state.
>
>
> Much appreciated,
> Vali
>
>
> On 04/09/2014 02:01 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 13:55:47 Vali Cobelea wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/09/2014 01:51 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday 08 April 2014 18:34:08 Vali Cobelea wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Here at ENEA we decided to take the initiative regarding the CGL
>>>>> compliance when it comes to the Yocto Project.
>>>>> For this we started the work on a dedicated layer called 'meta-cgl'
>>>>>
>>>>> which can be accessed / cloned from here:
>>>>>     http://git.enea.com/git/?p=linux/meta-cgl.git
>>>>>     git clone git at git.enea.com:linux/meta-cgl
>>>>>
>>>>> Have a look of the things we got there so far, please remember that
>>>>> there is still plenty of work to be done (layer architecture, CGL
>>>>> requirements coverage mode and so on).
>>>>> It is a little bit more than a stub layer, consider it a starting point
>>>>> for the direction we would like to have with this layer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any input is much appreciated, lets keep the discussion by this email
>>>>> thread and see where it goes.
>>>>>
>>>> I don't have anything to offer on the layer contents, but I would say in
>>>> order to make it easy for people to find this layer I would strongly
>>>> encourage you to>
>>>> submit it to the OpenEmbedded layer index:
>>>>     http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/submit/
>>>>
>>> Thank you for the input.
>>> We will keep the layer for a short period of time at the current
>>> location while getting other ideas regarding the content / architecture.
>>> The layer initiative will also be raised up in the board advisory
>>> meeting, in order to get even more input.
>>> After which we will make it easier to find, access and use for anyone,
>>> exactly as you suggested.
>>>
>> OK, as the maintainer it's totally up to you.
>>
>> I would say though generally that I'd like to see more people adding their
>> work-in-progress layers to the layer index, even if at some time later
>> they
>> will be moved elsewhere or absorbed into another layer - it just makes it
>> easier to point people to the layer index so they can find recipes that
>> have
>> already been written, rather than having to re-write them from scratch.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Paul
>>
>>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20140410/cd126619/attachment.html>