[yocto] preserving file owners in do_package
Paul Eggleton
paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com
Tue Oct 15 14:54:34 PDT 2013
On Tuesday 15 October 2013 17:18:35 Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 October 2013 18:12:42 Davide Soldan wrote:
> > In data martedì 15 ottobre 2013 11:38:21, Paul Eggleton ha scritto:
> > > On Tuesday 15 October 2013 12:02:20 Davide Soldan wrote:
> > > > in my recipe I want to change owner and permission of a file, so I
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > do_install() {
> > > >
> > > > ls -la ${D}/opt/user
> > > > chown -R user ${D}/opt/user
> > > > chgrp -R user ${D}/opt/user
> > > > ls -la ${D}/opt/user
> > > > chmod 754 ${D}/opt/user/user.sh
> > > > ls -la ${D}/opt/user
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > the output of ls commands is:
> > > >
> > > > drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4096 Oct 15 11:13 .
> > > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Oct 15 11:13 ..
> > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 *root root* 55753 Aug 2 08:48 user.sh
> > > >
> > > > drwxr-xr-x 8 user user 4096 Oct 15 11:13 .
> > > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Oct 15 11:13 ..
> > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 *user user* 55753 Aug 2 08:48 user.sh
> > > >
> > > > drwxr-xr-x 8 user user 4096 Oct 15 11:13 .
> > > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Oct 15 11:13 ..
> > > > *-rwxr-xr--* 1 user user 55753 Aug 2 08:48 user.sh
> > > >
> > > > So the change of owner and permission works fine in do_install phase.
> > > > Opening the final rootfs tarball, however, the file user.sh has still
> > > > 754
> > > > permission but root as owner...so do_package doesn't preserve owner
> > > > change
> > > > done in do_install? Or maybe I'm doing something wrong in changing
> > > > file
> > > > owner? Any ideas? Thanks to all!
> > >
> > > Does your recipe create the specified user via useradd.bbclass?
> >
> > I solved with a postinstall script (that run at boot):
> >
> > pkg_postinst_${PN}() {
> >
> > #!/bin/sh -e
> > if [ x"$D" = "x" ]; then
> >
> > chown -R user /opt/user
> > chgrp -R user /opt/user
> >
> > else
> >
> > exit 1
> >
> > fi
> >
> > }
>
> This shouldn't be necessary though. I honestly can't tell you why it doesn't
> work as specified. I think it might be worth filing a bug for this.
Actually, thinking about it I don't think this is expected to work. Typically,
recipes that need a specific user to exist use useradd.bbclass themselves
rather than depending upon another recipe that does it. However, if you do
need to do it in a separate recipe (e.g. because multiple recipes use the same
user account), just adding the other recipe to DEPENDS does not guarantee that
it will be around at runtime - the actual package generated by the other
recipe (usually the same name) would need to be added to RDEPENDS_${PN}.
Additionally, if you do this, you should be able to have your postinstall
script run at all times; it should not need to be guarded to run only on the
target (although https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5318 may
interfere with this if you are using ipk or deb.)
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the yocto
mailing list