[yocto] Autobuilder migration status.

[Chris Larson]

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Flanagan, Elizabeth <
elizabeth.flanagan at intel.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Trevor Woerner <twoerner at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I have looked at the output from a couple builds (nightly-fsl-arm,
> > nightly-fsl-ppc, nightly-mips) and had a couple questions.
> >
> > Running "poky/oe-init-build-env" will produce a
> > "build/conf/local.conf", but the nightly builder prefers to puts its
> > configurations into "build/conf/auto.conf". Obviously there's nothing
> > wrong with this, but I'm wondering why use auto.conf instead of
> > local.conf? I'm guessing there's some nugget of information in this
> > choice that I'm hoping to discover.
>
> It's nothing particularly special, except I do it to differentiate an
> autogenerated local.conf from the local.conf that is created by
> oe-init-build-env. I'm sure there was a different reason for it, but
> the commit log never made it over from the o-hand.org svn server so...


Yeah, that's basically why auto.conf is supported at all. It was
specifically intended to be used for generated content primarily for
autobuilders :)
-- 
Christopher Larson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20130325/d2976aad/attachment.html>