[yocto] Yet another LIC_FILES_CHKSUM question

[Hans Beckérus]

In what way does LIC_FILES_CHKSUM correlate to what is specified in LICENSE?
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM *must* be specified unless LICENSE is set to CLOSED.
But, what if the package does not itself provide a license type file?
Is it then ok to simply leave LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "" ?

Also, I could see that there was an Erlang Public License file
available in poky. But the file is named ErlPL-1.1 and there were no
maps attached to it, this patch will add that.

Hans

diff --git a/meta/conf/licenses.conf b/meta/conf/licenses.conf
index 3cb143c..ffed997 100644
--- a/meta/conf/licenses.conf
+++ b/meta/conf/licenses.conf
@@ -101,9 +101,14 @@ SPDXLICENSEMAP[AFL-1] = "AFL-1.2"
 SPDXLICENSEMAP[AFLv2] = "AFL-2.0"
 SPDXLICENSEMAP[AFLv1] = "AFL-1.2"

+#Erlang variations
+SPDXLICENSEMAP[ErlPLv1.1] = "ErlPL-1.1"
+SPDXLICENSEMAP[ErlPL1.1] = "ErlPL-1.1"
+
 #Other variations
 SPDXLICENSEMAP[EPLv1.0] = "EPL-1.0"

+
 # Additional license directories. Add your custom licenses
directories this path.
 # LICENSE_PATH += "${COREBASE}/custom-licenses"