[yocto] beagleboard, qemuarm, beaglebone, and pandaboard images.

Edward Vidal vidal.develone at gmail.com
Tue Apr 16 07:35:22 PDT 2013


Ross,
My local.conf is the same for all builds.  The only thing is beaglebone and
pandaboard are using meta-ti which require a chg to bblayer.conf.  All
generate a different kernel
beagleboard 3.4.36
qemuarm 3.8.4
beaglebone 3.2.28
pandaboard 3.4.11
Also all are using meta-yocto        =
"master:068085f79010e3db70085d4b789f84ae721e4901"
I have seen the rpm -qa that is where I noticed the different number of
pkgs installed.
They all use EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES = "debug-tweaks tools-sdk".in local.conf
Something within the build is deciding which pkgs get installed between
different builds.  I would expect several different RPMs but not hundreds
as was the case.
Thanks



On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton at intel.com> wrote:

> On 16 April 2013 15:01, Edward Vidal <vidal.develone at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I did a search for installed-pkgs.txt and complementary-pkgs.txt neither
> of
> > these files were on my system.  I am assuming this is because in my
> > local.conf I am using INHERIT += "rm_work".
> > as found on page 41 of the ref_manual.  What is the difference between
> the
> > two pkgs sets?  The does reduce the capabilities of the systems?  Can the
> > complementary-pkgs.txt be installed with a flag?
>
> Yes, rm_work will delete those files.
>
> As far as I know, "installed" is the packages explicitly installed,
> "complementary" is the set installed through features such as
> dev-pkgs.
>
> If you really want to find the differences on these images, boot each
> and dump the installed package list (rpm -qa?).
>
> Ross
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20130416/8a9141ec/attachment.html>


More information about the yocto mailing list