[yocto] About bug 2331

Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfield at gmail.com
Wed Sep 19 16:36:04 PDT 2012


On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Marc Ferland <ferlandm at sonatest.com> wrote:
> Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com> writes:
>
>> On 09/19/2012 01:53 PM, Marc Ferland wrote:
>>> Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 09/19/2012 01:41 PM, Marc Ferland wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm currently trying to create a "live" system with squashfs+unionfs and
>>>>> I stumbled on the same bug described here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2331
>>>>>
>>>>> I was wondering if there was a plan to resolve this issue for 1.3?
>>>>>
>>>> Marc,
>>>>
>>>> It seems to be marked as resolved and verified, is there still and
>>>> issue?  If so we need to reopen this bug.  Or are you referring to the
>>>> underlying issue?
>>>>
>>> I was referring to the underlying issue.
>>>
>>>
>> No, unfortunately it seems that did not have visibility, I think bug
>> 1487 is open against that issue, at least with an ISO image, which is
>> what got partially reverted.  I think the issue was upstream unionfs,
>> do you know if any changes to resolve the problem upstream?
>>
> Unfortunately no. Maybe I'll have more chance using aufs or maybe
> overlayfs. Unionfs looks pretty much dead... I'm probably better off
> without it!

If you check the unionfs support I have staged in the 3.4 kernel, it contains
several big usability fixes.

If you look at the yocto dev kernel, I've dropped unionfs and am taking aufs
for a spin (while watching overlayfs and unionmounts as well).

So there are options to try that may address that issue, and also chart a
way forward.

Cheers,

Bruce

> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto



-- 
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end"



More information about the yocto mailing list