[yocto] yocto beagleboard.conf -- should it not go away?

[Tomas Frydrych]

On 05/09/12 22:46, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 09:58 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
>> Hi Bruce,
>>
>> On 03/09/12 22:08, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>> That being said, taking a step back, what are you trying to get out of
>>> meta-yocto in this scenario ? 
>>
>> a) I am targeting multiple chips, including TI Omap and Intel Atom.
>> meta-yocto is a prerequisite for the various machines in meta-intel, so
>> I have to include meta-yocto if I want to build images for an Intel
>> chip. Nothing unusual here.
> 
> Is that really true? What in meta-intel depends on meta-yocto?

No, it is not true; I corrected that erroneous statement earlier in this
thread.


> Effectively this is what we've now done and was always the intention
> (see the Yocto Project compatible criteria).

Yes, that looks like it solves the problem neatly. Now I should be able
to include both meta-yocto and meta-yocto-bsb if I want to.

Tomas