[yocto] [PATCH 06/10] meta/crownbay: factor out policy-related options

[Darren Hart]

On 05/11/2012 03:42 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 15:35 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>>
>> On 05/11/2012 03:08 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 09:18 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>>
>>>> Independent from this patch, but does crownbay have all three? ehci and
>>>> ohci seems a lot more likely to me.
>>>>
>>>
>>> lsusb shows ehci and ohci, but why did you think ohci would be more
>>> likely?
>>>
>>> Tom
>>
>>
>> I believe UHCI is only seen on non-intel platforms, primarily AMD and
>> maybe VIA systems... just something I had a vague recollection of.
>>
> 
> I thought it was the opposite, but was probably thrown off by emenlow
> which has UHCI...

  │ Symbol: USB_UHCI_HCD [=y]                                                  │  
  │ Type  : tristate                                                           │  
  │ Prompt: UHCI HCD (most Intel and VIA) support                              │  
  │   Defined at drivers/usb/host/Kconfig:444                                  │  
  │   Depends on: USB_SUPPORT [=y] && USB [=y] && (PCI [=y] || SPARC_LEON)     │  
  │   Location:                                                                │  
  │     -> Device Drivers                                                      │  
  │       -> USB support (USB_SUPPORT [=y]) 


And I see lots of ARM OHCI bits... so maybe you're right. But for the EG20T, as
you pointed out, it seems to be EHCI and OHCI for whatever reason.


-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel