[yocto] Yocto Development Manual Appendix B question

Tue Jun 26 13:40:05 PDT 2012

On 06/26/2012 04:21 PM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> Jim,
>
> Yes - I am still running the very last part of my test.  If that is the change then I will make it to the 1.2 version of the manual and publish it to the website.
>
> Scott

While I had this working I thought I'd complete the Appendix B example 
for the CONFIG_SMP change.  I'm finding problems with the compile step 
after menuconfig is run to turn off SMP.  I get a mismatch that I don't 
understand:

Value requested for CONFIG_SMP not in final ".config"
Requested value: "CONFIG_SMP=y"
Actual value set: "# CONFIG_SMP is not set"

There must be another setting of CONFIG_SMP that is conflicting with the 
.config file

Jim A

> -----Original Message-----
> From: yocto-bounces at yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-bounces at yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of jfabernathy
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 12:50 PM
> To: yocto at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [yocto] Yocto Development Manual Appendix B question
>
> On 06/26/2012 02:07 PM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
>> When I attempted to rebuild minimal I hit the same error you did Jim regarding kern-tools-native.  This would be expected as Bruce pointed out that problem is alive in denzil.  I am going to set the poky-extras branch to 'denzil' and retry that part of the example.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: yocto-bounces at yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-bounces at yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Rifenbark, Scott M
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 10:44 AM
>> To: Bruce Ashfield
>> Cc: yocto at yoctoproject.org
>> Subject: Re: [yocto] Yocto Development Manual Appendix B question
>>
>> I am on task 1507 of 1606 of a minimal build (from the example).  No issues so far.
> So now that Denzil has a branch in poky-extra, the only doc change is to
> add the checkout -b denzil statement for the poky-extra directory.
> Everything else is correct.
>
> Jim A
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield at windriver.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 10:42 AM
>> To: Rifenbark, Scott M
>> Cc: jfabernathy; yocto at yoctoproject.org
>> Subject: Re: [yocto] Yocto Development Manual Appendix B question
>>
>> On 12-06-26 12:30 PM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
>>> I am going to run through the B.1 example verbatim from the "current" version of the manual and see what happens.
>> Fixing the license check was just a matter of me locking the SRCREV
>> for the tools to a value that works for denzil. I just pushed a denzil
>> branch to poky-extras that built and booted the yocto kernel for
>> me.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield at windriver.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:28 AM
>>> To: Rifenbark, Scott M
>>> Cc: jfabernathy; yocto at yoctoproject.org
>>> Subject: Re: [yocto] Yocto Development Manual Appendix B question
>>>
>>> On 12-06-26 12:26 PM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
>>>> This is a good point.  In looking at the example it does not say what branch you should be dealing with for poky-extras.
>>> And I'm configuring a test right now and will create a denzil
>>> branch, once I see it works.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield at windriver.com]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:24 AM
>>>> To: jfabernathy
>>>> Cc: Rifenbark, Scott M; yocto at yoctoproject.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [yocto] Yocto Development Manual Appendix B question
>>>>
>>>> On 12-06-26 12:11 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
>>>>> On 06/26/2012 12:04 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>>>>> On 12-06-26 12:00 PM, jfabernathy wrote:
>>>>>>> On 06/26/2012 10:56 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
>>>>>>>> Bruce,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Should the example note this? Would it be best to specifically say to
>>>>>>>> uncomment that SRC_URI line?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>>> I think some text needs to be added. I uncommented the SRC_URI line and
>>>>>>> I still fail building the image. The failure is related to kernel tools:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ERROR: kern-tools-native: md5 data is not matching for
>>>>>>> file://git/tools/kgit;beginline=5;endline=9;md5=e2bf4415f3d843f43d2e22b0d91a6fee
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ERROR: kern-tools-native: The new md5 checksum is
>>>>>>> d8d1d729a70cd5f52972f8884b80743d
>>>>>>> ERROR: kern-tools-native: Check if the license information has
>>>>>>> changed in
>>>>>>> ERROR: Licensing Error: LIC_FILES_CHKSUM does not match, please fix
>>>>>>> ERROR: Function failed: do_qa_configure
>>>>>> This one is actually fixed on master, but poky-extras .. is just that
>>>>>> 'extra', so this may still be alive in that repo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This wouldn't need to be documented, since it's a bug/issue, and not
>>>>>> something that would persist.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What release are you pairing poky extras with ? I can always create a
>>>>>> branch to make sure they are consistent.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I was using Denzil because the snapshot noted in the example does not
>>>>> exist. So there is another doc issue.
>>>> Aha. In this case, we could note that the poky-extras repo branch should
>>>> match the main repository branch .. and I could ensure that meta-kernel-dev
>>>> works in that configuration.
>>>>
>>>> That's likely the right solution, rather than forcing you to switch to
>>>> master (unless you want to :)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Bruce
>>>>
>>>>> I can always test on Master, but the docs need to be update to reflect
>>>>> something that will work to completion without errors, IMHO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jim A
>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jim A
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: yocto-bounces at yoctoproject.org
>>>>>>>> [mailto:yocto-bounces at yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Ashfield
>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 7:54 AM
>>>>>>>> To: jfabernathy
>>>>>>>> Cc: yocto at yoctoproject.org
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [yocto] Yocto Development Manual Appendix B question
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12-06-26 10:52 AM, jfabernathy wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In the example in The Developement Manual v1.2 in Appendix B Section
>>>>>>>>> B.1.7, it states that you need to put in the statement:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> KSRC_linux_yocto_3_2 ?="/home/scottrif/linux-yocto-3.2.git"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> into the appropriate .bbappend file way now in the poky-extra
>>>>>>>>> directory
>>>>>>>>> structure. If I look at that file, |linux-yocto_3.2.bbappend| , I
>>>>>>>>> seen a
>>>>>>>>> SRC_URI line, immediately after our inserted KSRC statement, that is
>>>>>>>>> commented out:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> # SRC_URI =
>>>>>>>>> "git://${KSRC_linux_yocto_3_2};protocol=file;nocheckout=1;branch=${KBRANCH},meta;name=machine,meta"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Should that line be uncommented or is the SRC_URI already defaulted
>>>>>>>>> somewhere to use the newly defined KSRC_linux_yocto_3_2 variable?
>>>>>>>> It should be uncommented. I commented them by default, since the extras
>>>>>>>> repository is a bit of a collection ground. If they are uncommented,
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> combined with the AUTOREV also set in the file, you are forced to fix
>>>>>>>> all files, versus just the one you want.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jim A
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> yocto mailing list
>>>>>>>>> yocto at yoctoproject.org
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> yocto mailing list
>>>>>>>> yocto at yoctoproject.org
>>>>>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>> _______________________________________________
>> yocto mailing list
>> yocto at yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>> _______________________________________________
>> yocto mailing list
>> yocto at yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto