[yocto] VERIFIED vs CLOSED in yocto bugzilla

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Tue Jun 19 13:19:29 PDT 2012


On Tuesday, June 19, 2012, Serban, Laurentiu <laurentiu.serban at intel.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I submit to your attention the following issue related to Yocto project’s
bugzilla:
>
>
>
> Which is the most appropriate end for a the lifecycle of a bugzilla
issue: VERIFIED or CLOSED?
>
> Currently the bug lifecycle final point is VERIFIED and the status CLOSED
is not used. Setting a bug to CLOSED after it was VERIFIED has no impact on
the lifecycle itself as the bug can be reopened anyway.
>
>
>
> My proposal is the following: keep VERIFIED as the final point of the bug
lifecycle and use the status CLOSED for the bug only after the 1.3 release,
if the regression testing for the bug is ran and passed.
>
> So after the 1.3 release the ideal situation is that all the bugs related
to it with previous status VERIFIED are CLOSED.
>
>
>
> Waiting for your opinion on this,
>

Closed is something for the original submitter IMO
He should be the one to mark the bug closed
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Laurentiu Serban
>
> QA Engineer
>
> Open Source Technology Center
>
> System Software Division Romania
>
> Desk: +40 31 8604742
>
> iNET: 88451042
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20120619/462bbb0d/attachment.html>


More information about the yocto mailing list