[yocto] More useful generic-x86 machine

[Darren Hart]

On 06/13/2012 01:55 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 12-06-13 04:52 PM, Ross Burton wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 at 21:47, Darren Hart wrote:
>>> Seems reasonable to me. We should probably have 32b and 64b of this
>>> machine as well.
>>
>> And x32… :)
> 
>  From the kernel point of view, these are just configuration extensions
> to a base, which is where this discussion started (the kernel, I'm
> excluding userspace on purpose). So this should be one machine with
> these as overlays, not three different machines.

I would have thought the three different architectures would have called
for three different machines. How would this work from the KMACHINE
meta-data perspective?

--
Darren

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Bruce
> 
>>
>> Ross
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yocto mailing list
>> yocto at yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> 

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel