[yocto] Bugzilla Re-organization
Tom Zanussi
tom.zanussi at intel.com
Fri Jun 1 14:33:34 PDT 2012
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 10:45 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>
> On 05/31/2012 08:37 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On 12-05-31 2:27 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 05/25/2012 03:38 PM, Michael Halstead wrote:
> >>> The first draft of the reorganized bugzilla is available for feedback
> >>> now at https://bugzilla.yoctodev.org/. Outgoing e-mail is currently
> >>> disabled on this preview copy. Please feel free to take a look and see
> >>> if you spot any errors. Additional refinement of product or component
> >>> descriptions will be helpful as well.
> >>>
> >>
> >> It seems to me one should be able to find the linux-yocto kernel itself
> >> under the Yocto Project Components from the basic search page. Currently
> >> there is Kernel Tooling and BSPs, but there are times when the bug is
> >> not BSP specific and is in the kernel itself, not the tooling. For this,
> >> a hierarchy like the following might be preferable:
> >>
> >> Yocto Project Components
> >> BSPs
> >> bsps
> >> Kernel
> >> linux-yocto
> >> configuration
> >> kernel-tooling
> >
> > +1. I completely agree with this.
> >
> >>
> >> I am still not sure how best to deal with BSPs here and BSPs in Build
> >> System& Metadata. I think We should pick one or the other as the
> >> distinction between the two is non-obvious (actually I have no idea what
> >> it would be).
> >
> > Agreed .. that this is hard. If we used 'configuration' for the kernel
> > category, could the build system + meta data fall into that as well
> > under BSPs ?
> >
> > i.e.
> >
> > BSPs
> > bsps - runtime
> > bsps - configuration
>
> I think so. I like this better.
>
> Tom, any objections?
>
No objections, this all looks fine to me.
> Yocto Project Components
> BSPs
> bsps-runtime
> bsps-configuration
> Kernel
> linux-yocto
> kernel-configuration
> kernel-tooling
>
> The other Kernel related path would include
> Build System & Metadata
> Layers - OpenEmbedded-Core
> kernel
>
> This would be for the kernel.bbclass and other recipes and classes.
>
It would be nice to have that fact reflected in the name somehow, to
avoid confusion for users with Yocto Project Components->Kernel, but I'm
not coming up with anything wieldy.
> I think we should just kill:
> Build System & Metadata
> Layers - BSPs
>
> and move all the BSP components under Yocto Project Components->BSPs
>
I agree, it would just add confusion to keep this.
> Finally there is:
>
> Build System & Metadata
> Layers - meta-yocto
> machines
>
> Which should just go away and be replaced witha BSPs->meta-yocto
> component, if anything.
>
Better known as 'core BSPs', which might be more clear to some...
> So, the final layout would be:
>
> Yocto Project Components
> BSPs
> bsps-runtime
> bsps-configuration (these top too being "generic" buckets)
> bsps-meta-yocto
On the other hand this naming is clean and consistent with the rest, so
is probably better.
> bsps-meta-fsl-ppc
> bsps-meta-intel
> bsps-meta-ti
> bsps-tools
> bsps-xilinx (meta-xilinx?)
>
> Kernel
> linux-yocto
> kernel-configuration
> kernel-tooling
>
> I believe this would make it much easier for us to manage Kernel related
> issues across the project.
>
I agree. Acked-by-me...
Tom
> --
> Darren
>
>
> >
> > ?
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> >>
> >> Tom, Bruce: opinions on the above?
> >>
> >>
> >> "Build System& Metadata" and "Yocto Metadata Layers" use different
> >> naming schemes for the components in the various layers products. Some
> >> use meta- others do not.
> >>
> >>
> >
>
More information about the yocto
mailing list