[yocto] Debug with gdbserver
Khem Raj
raj.khem at gmail.com
Tue Jul 31 21:55:31 PDT 2012
On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:47 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 07/31/2012 08:13 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 31, 2012, at 7:46 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am trying to debug a userpsace application that misbehaves under
>>> poky-tiny. My current approach is use gdbserver on the target and attach
>>> to the offending process, then connect to it on the client using the
>>> yocto-built native gdb for the target.
>>>
>>> I can easily add gdbserver to the target image, and can successfully
>>> connect it to the process:
>>>
>>> # From the target (qemux86) root shell:
>>> # dropbearkey -t rsa -f ./rsa
>>> # dropbear -r ./rsa
>>> # DBPID=$(ps | grep dropbear | head -n1 | cut -f4 -d ' ')
>>> # gdbserver 127.0.0.1:1234 --attach $DBPID
>>>
>>> Now on the host machine (amd64) I want to:
>>> $ gdb????
>>> (gdb) target extended-remote 127.0.0.1:1234
>>>
>>> Which package do I need to build to get the appropriate gdb for the host
>>> to remote debug processes on the target?
>>
>> bake cross-gdb for your arch and use it same way as above
>
> ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'cross-gdb'
>
> gdb-cross maybe?
>
I meant cross gdb not the exact recipe name :)
> Ah that gets a lot farther... and then do_compile fails.
>
> | libgdb.a(python.o): In function `gdbpy_target_wide_charset':
> | python.c:(.text+0x1c7): undefined reference to `PyUnicodeUCS4_Decode'
>
> And a lot more similar to that. I'm doing this on poky-tiny (so a
> minimal target libc... shouldn't impact native bits though right?
shouldn't it seems you need python native
>
>
> Will beat on it some more in the morning.
>
> --
> Darren Hart
> Intel Open Source Technology Center
> Yocto Project - Technical Lead - Linux Kernel
More information about the yocto
mailing list