[yocto] ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-yocto_3.2.bb

[Bodke, Kishore K]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield at windriver.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:35 PM
>To: Bodke, Kishore K
>Cc: yocto at yoctoproject.org; Zanussi, Tom; Darren Hart
>Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-
>yocto_3.2.bb
>
>On 12-07-17 8:32 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield at windriver.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:30 PM
>>> To: Bodke, Kishore K
>>> Cc: yocto at yoctoproject.org; Zanussi, Tom; Darren Hart
>>> Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for
>linux-
>>> yocto_3.2.bb
>>>
>>> On 12-07-17 8:25 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield at windriver.com]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:21 PM
>>>>> To: Bodke, Kishore K
>>>>> Cc: yocto at yoctoproject.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for
>>> linux-
>>>>> yocto_3.2.bb
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12-07-17 8:16 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am using local clone for 3.2 kernel and I get build fail for
>>>>>> Linux-yocto_3.2.bb.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WARNING: For recipe linux-yocto, the following files/directories were
>>>>>> installed but not shipped in any package:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WARNING: /etc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) on
>>>>>> /work/<....>/linux-yocto-
>>>>>
>>>
>3.2.18+git1+20958298c233d15b1d705e7b0eb93282d6ecb5de_1+7d26ac083cb2
>>>>> 55888536b42b622b97fb438753ad-r1/packages-split/kernel-
>>>>> vmlinux/boot/vmlinux-3.2.18-yocto-standard
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ERROR: QA run found fatal errors. Please consider fixing them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ERROR: Function failed: do_package_qa
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any idea why I get this?
>>>>>
>>>>> It means you've managed to get a 32 bit object in a 64 bit build.
>>>>> Have you tweaked the configuration ?
>>>>
>>>> I have not edited any configuration.  I am using all 64 bit only.
>>>
>>> Can anyone else confirm this ? What BSP is this ? either it isn't
>>> listed above .. or I missed it. Tom ? Darren ? I don't have a build
>>> handy to check.
>>
>> I am building a new BSP which is not listed here.  That is the reason I am
>using local clone.
>> I cloned 3.2 kernel and created a new BSP based on ROMLEY.
>
>Without seeing your configuration, I can't say more. It looks like the
>tuning for userspace is 64 and you've built a 32 bit kernel, or vice
>versa.

I tried rebuilding from scratch. It built fine.
Not sure why it failed for the first time, Though it was the same configurations settings I had.

Thanks
Kishore.

>
>Darren/Tom may be able to help more.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Bruce
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Kishore.
>>
>>>
>>> I can start a build overnight to try and see what is happening, if you
>>> send the details about what you are building here.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kishore.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>