[yocto] menuconfig vs. config fragments?
Jack Mitchell
ml at communistcode.co.uk
Mon Jul 9 04:12:02 PDT 2012
On 09/07/12 11:42, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:39 PM, James Abernathy <jfabernathy at gmail.com
> <mailto:jfabernathy at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> my goal of this test was to see if I could use the n450 BSP as a
> starting point for a BSP to support my Acer Aspire One n450 based
> netbook. The core-image-sato will boot from USB key on the
> netbook if I use the ZIP drive format for the USB key, but the
> current n450 BSP doesn't include the drivers for the networking
> hardware in the netbook.
>
> I found by testing, using the menuconfig option documented in the
> Developer Manual Appendix B example, that I needed to add 2
> parameters to the .config:
>
> CONFIG_ATH9K_PCI
> CONFIG_ATL1C
>
> To make this change easier to manage and more permanent, I thought
> about creating a config fragment. I put the config parameters in
> a file, myconfig, in the linux-yocto directory at the same level
> as the linux-yocto_3.2.bbappend file, where I added:
>
> SRC_URI += "file//myconfig"
>
>
> Try to use myconfig.cfg.
>
> @g
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
I agree, something in the back of my mind is shouting that config
fragments should have a .cfg extension.
Regards,
--
Jack Mitchell (jack at embed.me.uk)
Embedded Systems Engineer
http://www.embed.me.uk
--
More information about the yocto
mailing list