[yocto] [pull-sys940x 2/4] ranpwd: Add ranpwd recipe

[Khem Raj]

On (10/02/12 16:14), Darren Hart wrote:
> 
> 
> On 02/06/2012 11:06 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:59:36PM -0800, Joshua Lock wrote:
> >> On 06/02/12 08:17, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >>> On Thursday 02 February 2012 13:11:19 Joshua Lock wrote:
> >>>> Apologies. I'm wrong here. It was PRIORITY which we agreed to drop.
> >>>
> >>> It's worth noting however, at the same time PRIORITY removal was discussed it
> >>> was acknowledged that SECTION was questionable. Logical grouping of
> >>> recipes/packages is a useful thing but coming up with groupings that are
> >>> meaningful in all contexts is hard :(
> >>
> >> Glad to know my recollection isn't wildly off the mark.
> >>
> >> I noticed that there are similar, yet different, SECTION values being 
> >> used. If we opt to keep SECTION I wonder if we should try and 
> >> standardise/sanitise it?
> > 
> > If there is standardised SECTION variable why not use
> > recipes-${SECTION}/foo_1.0.bb as we already have couple of recipe-*
> > directories and it's sometimes hard to decide to which directory
> > something belongs.
> > 
> > Or other way around, standartise recipes-* directories and let bitbake
> > decide SECTION from it (like it does for PV and PN).

thats a good idea