[yocto] [PATCH 0/2] More fixes for bug 1428

[Tom Zanussi]

On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 10:45 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 08:57 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 06:17 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 14:27 -0500, tom.zanussi at intel.com wrote:
> > > > From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi at intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > oe-core commit dc3a8274c7e935fa564eea142d2535c9bcf2b272 for YOCTO #1428
> > > > broke meta-intel x86_64 builds:
> > > > 
> > > > NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
> > > > ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'initramfs-live-install' (but /usr/local/src/yocto/sugarbay/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
> > > > ERROR: initramfs-live-install was skipped: incompatible with host x86_64-poky-linux
> > > > 
> > > > This patchset restores the build.
> > > > 
> > > > Build and install-tested on sugarbay and crownbay.
> > > > 
> > > > More fixes for [YOCTO #1428]
> > > > 
> > > > The following changes since commit b86f811663d834064af1e6778c408eb904fad0b9:
> > > >   Darren Hart (1):
> > > >         n450: update linux-yocto PREFERRED_VERSION to 3.0%
> > > > 
> > > > are available in the git repository at:
> > > > 
> > > >   git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-intel.git tzanussi/1428-fix
> > > >   http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel/log/?h=tzanussi/1428-fix
> > > > 
> > > > Tom Zanussi (2):
> > > >   meta-intel/common: create a grub2 version initramfs-live-install
> > > >   meta-intel/common: remove initramfs-live-install 1.0 bbappend
> > > 
> > > Is there a disadvantage to moving to grub2 in OE-Core and then bringing
> > > these pieces into sync?
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, it would make sense - the plan was to do that during the 1.2
> > cycle...
> 
> If someone can confirm that 32 and 64 bit live images work with grub2
> and there is no good reason not to do this, I'd be in favour of doing
> this now rather than explain why its a mess...
> 

I haven't tried the 32-bit BSPs with grub2 - been focused on other
things until this incomplete fix for 1428 seems to have forced the
issue, but can try it over the weekend and see what happens.

grub2 isn't a simple version bump from the legacy grub 0.97, but is a
completely incompatible re-write - I thought being more cautious in
removing the grub 0.97 that's worked fine for everything but the couple
of 64-bit meta-intel BSPs that need it would be something for 1.2, but
if it can go in now, why not...

Tom

> Cheers,
> 
> Richard
>