[yocto] [PATCH 0/2] More fixes for bug 1428

[Tom Zanussi]

On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 06:17 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 14:27 -0500, tom.zanussi at intel.com wrote:
> > From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi at intel.com>
> > 
> > oe-core commit dc3a8274c7e935fa564eea142d2535c9bcf2b272 for YOCTO #1428
> > broke meta-intel x86_64 builds:
> > 
> > NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
> > ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'initramfs-live-install' (but /usr/local/src/yocto/sugarbay/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
> > ERROR: initramfs-live-install was skipped: incompatible with host x86_64-poky-linux
> > 
> > This patchset restores the build.
> > 
> > Build and install-tested on sugarbay and crownbay.
> > 
> > More fixes for [YOCTO #1428]
> > 
> > The following changes since commit b86f811663d834064af1e6778c408eb904fad0b9:
> >   Darren Hart (1):
> >         n450: update linux-yocto PREFERRED_VERSION to 3.0%
> > 
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-intel.git tzanussi/1428-fix
> >   http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel/log/?h=tzanussi/1428-fix
> > 
> > Tom Zanussi (2):
> >   meta-intel/common: create a grub2 version initramfs-live-install
> >   meta-intel/common: remove initramfs-live-install 1.0 bbappend
> 
> Is there a disadvantage to moving to grub2 in OE-Core and then bringing
> these pieces into sync?
> 

Yes, it would make sense - the plan was to do that during the 1.2
cycle...

Tom

> Cheers,
> 
> Richard
>