[yocto] RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay

[Bodke, Kishore K]

For the build I removed the rttests in the IMAGE_INSTALL , so it is not showing up here.

bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "IMAGE_INSTALL="                                           
# MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL= 
# IMAGE_INSTALL=${POKY_BASE_INSTALL}
IMAGE_INSTALL="task-core-boot     task-base-extended"

I will rebuild with rttests and send the output.

Thanks
Kishore.

-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart at linux.intel.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:52 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto at yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay

Can you report the output of:

$ bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "^IMAGE_INSTALL="

Thanks,

Darren

On 09/01/2011 02:14 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
> Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds.
> Thanks
> Kishore.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart at linux.intel.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM
> To: Bodke, Kishore K
> Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto at yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
> Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
> 
> On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>> Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I
>> do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay.
>>
>> It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests"
> 
> Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second
> build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include
> a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate...
> 
> --
> Darren
> 
>>
>> Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart
>> [mailto:dvhart at linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011
>> 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K;
>> yocto at yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT
>> kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
>>
>>
>>
>> On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay
>>>> and it fails for the do_rootfs .
>>>>
>>>
>>> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt
>>> kernel:
>>>
>>> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed
>>> Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>
>>> using the following commits:
>>>
>>> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel
>>> 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea
>>>
>>> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on
>>> top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype).
>>>
>>
>> Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for
>> you?
>>
>> I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see
>> if I can reproduce the issue.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Darren
>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Attached is the build log.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could you please let me know what went wrong?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Kishore.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel