[yocto] RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
Bodke, Kishore K
kishore.k.bodke at intel.com
Thu Sep 1 14:01:47 PDT 2011
Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay.
It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests"
Thanks
Kishore.
-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart at linux.intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 1:57 PM
To: Zanussi, Tom
Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; yocto at yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and
>> it fails for the do_rootfs .
>>
>
> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt kernel:
>
> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed Aug 31
> 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> using the following commits:
>
> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e
> meta/intel 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea
>
> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on top
> (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype).
>
Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for you?
I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see if
I can reproduce the issue.
Thanks,
Darren
> Tom
>
>>
>>
>> Attached is the build log.
>>
>>
>>
>> Could you please let me know what went wrong?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Kishore.
>>
>>
>
>
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
More information about the yocto
mailing list