[yocto] In consistancy in the defition of BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf

Tom Zanussi tom.zanussi at intel.com
Wed May 25 20:37:45 PDT 2011


On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 18:17 -0700, Jeremy Puhlman wrote:
> Opps sent from wrong account.
> 
> I was working with some layerinfo code, and I noticed that the values of
> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf in the meta-intel repo are kind of all over the map:
> 
>  for each in */conf/layer.conf; do cat $each; done | grep BBFILE_COLLECTIONS
> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_crownbay += "crownbay"
> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_crownbay-noemgd += "crownbay-noemgd"
> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_fishriver += "fishriver"
> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_jasperforest += "jasperforest"
> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_sugarbay += "sugarbay"
> 
> For the above layers when I just list out oe-core and one of the above,
> the results from BBFILE_COLLECTIONS ends up
> just being what ever was set above.
> 
> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "n450"
> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "emenlow"
> 
> When using these layers, the final BBFILE_COLLECTIONS is the list of all
> the layers as expected.
> 
> Was just curious if there was a intentional reason why the
> difference(i.e. is there some code that I am missing that fixes this up)?

No, not intentional - looks like a case of an overzealous overriding
typo that propagated.  I'll cook up a patch to make them all just
'BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += xxxx'

Tom

> -- Jeremy Puhlman Montavista Sofware, LLC.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto





More information about the yocto mailing list