[yocto] crownbay-noemgd poky-image-minimal fails to build

Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfield at windriver.com
Fri Jul 29 07:02:13 PDT 2011


On 07/29/11 09:57, Malcolm Crossley wrote:
> On 29/07/2011 14:12, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> On 07/29/11 06:05, Andre Haupt wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:23:59AM +0200, Andre Haupt wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to build a poky bernard image for crownbay-noemgd.
>>>> For this i checked out the bernard branch of both poky and meta-intel
>>>> from git.yoctoproject.org.
>>>>
>>>> Bitbake fails during the kernels compile_perf task complaining that
>>>> it can not
>>>> find libdw.h and bfd.h and that using /usr/local/include as include
>>>> location is unsafe for cross compilation (full log attached).
>>>>
>>>> What do i miss here?
>>>
>>> I did work around this with
>>>
>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bb
>>> b/meta/recipes-
>>> index 3c1e669..85caa92 100644
>>> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bb
>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-stable_git.bb
>>> @@ -42,4 +42,4 @@ KERNEL_FEATURES=features/netfilter
>>> addtask kernel_link_vmlinux after do_compile before do_install
>>> addtask validate_branches before do_patch after do_kernel_checkout
>>>
>>> -require linux-tools.inc
>>> +#require linux-tools.inc
>>>
>>>
>>> not sure that this is the right thing to do though.
>>
>> It's an acceptable work around to keep you building on your
>> local machine, assuming that you don't need perf. But the
>> linux-yocto recipes always want to provide perf, and hence
>> have that include.
>>
>> I'm trying to dust off my memory here. I know that this has
>> been seen, and I also know that this built fine in the bernard
>> release.
>>
>> The first part of the issue is the:
>>
>> Makefile:508: No libdw.h found or old libdw.h found, disables dwarf
>> support. Please install elfutils-devel/elfutils-dev
>>
>> We may have a missing host dependency in the checks. Have you
>> tried installing the relevant package for F13 ?
>>
>> As for the second, there's a patch in the 2.6.34 kernel tree
>> that is dealing with it:
>>
>> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-2.6.34/commit/?h=standard&id=72ca49ab08b8eb475cec82a10049503602325791
>>
>>
>> It sounds like there may be a SRCREV problem for the board that
>> isn't picking up that change. Can you confirm that this commit
>> is in your board branch ? You can check in your build directory
>> for linux.
>
> I have found that stable branch 2.6.34 contains a bug when trying to
> build the perf tools. I have a patch but I've not been able to upstream
> it yet, I've copy pasted it inline here, hopefully it doesn't wrap too
> badly:

Just so I've got all the context here. This failure is
on top of the one you were asking about ? (the unsafe
/ includes). And this is unique to the 2.6.34-stable
perf variant (i.e. no other newer kernel release has
the issue) ?

with those answers, I can appropriately deal with it
and vector it to the right places.

Cheers,

Bruce

>
> Author: Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley at ge.com>
> Date: Fri Jul 22 22:44:53 2011 +0100
>
> Kernel version 2.6.34.6. has a bug with regards to it's perf tool source
> files. This patch adds a missing include directive.
>
> Signed-off-by: Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley at ge.com>
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.h b/tools/perf/perf.h
> index 6fb379b..3c497c5 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/perf.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/perf.h
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #include <sys/syscall.h>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
>
> #include "../../include/linux/perf_event.h"
> #include "util/types.h"
>
>
> Regards
>
> Malcolm
>
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>>
>>> Andre
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yocto mailing list
>>> yocto at yoctoproject.org
>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yocto mailing list
>> yocto at yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto




More information about the yocto mailing list