[yocto] [PATCH 4/9] linux-yocto-tiny: New kernel recipe for poky-tiny distro (INCOMPLETE)

Darren Hart dvhart at linux.intel.com
Wed Dec 21 08:02:49 PST 2011



On 12/21/2011 07:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 11-12-21 10:52 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/21/2011 06:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>> On 11-12-21 04:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>>> linux-yocto-tiny drops the linux-tools and sets the KMACHINE
>>>> branch to standard/tiny.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart<dvhart at linux.intel.com>
>>>> ---

...

>>>> +SRC_URI = "git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto-3.0;protocol=git;nocheckout=1;branch=${KBRANCH},meta;name=machine,meta \
>>>> +           file://core.cfg \
>>>> +           file://serial.cfg \
>>>> +           file://ext2.cfg \
>>>> +           file://rtc-pc.cfg \
>>>> +           file://ramfs.cfg \
>>>> +           file://devtmpfs.cfg \
>>>> +           file://net.cfg \
>>>> +           file://debug.cfg \
>>>> +           file://lzma.cfg \
>>>> +           "
>>>
>>> So I assume that the order of these doesn't really matter, and that
>>> they are non-overlapping ? The answer must be yes, since you've been
>>> testing this, and you don't have a .scc file to control their order :)
>>>
>>
>> That's correct.
>>
>>> Other than that, it looks pretty good to me.
>>
>> Great. Did you have a close look at core.cfg? It along with things like
>> devtmpfs and ramfs are likely to form the basis of the linux-yocto tiny
>> ktype general policy.
> 
> I had a 'medium' depth look :) I didn't see anything outrageous
> or shocking. I'll loop back and have a better look later as well.

I'm mostly interested in things that are MISSING.

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel



More information about the yocto mailing list