[yocto] Sanity tested distributions list

[David Smoot]

On Dec 6, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:

Hi all,

We had some discussions [1] [2] about this last cycle but I don't feel we 
reached a proper conclusion on the list of tested distributions we want to set 
(SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS) and I assume we want to support a few more distros 
(latest versions of Fedora & Ubuntu, presumably?). I'd like to update and re-
post the patch [3] so we can close bug #1096 [4] but for that we need to agree 
on the list.

Thanks,
Paul

[1] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2011-August/004699.html

[2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.embedded.poky/6959

[3] http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-
contrib/log/?h=paule/sanity-distros

[4] http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1096

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto at yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

You may not be looking for anecdotal build data but I imagine I'm one of the few building on FC 16.

Through an unintentional upgrade (don't ask), I have built and tested the following combinations to boot on actual hardware built on a Fedora Core 16 host:

On a Routerstation Pro:
Core image minimal
Core image basic
Core image base (both USB Root file system and SD root file system)
demo-image-mediatomb (but mediatomb itself segfaults in initialization)

On a Beagleboard
Core Image Sato (with Linksys USB network adapter functioning)
demo-image-mediatomb (mediatomb does not segfault).

I'm having some trouble on the Atom platform but I think it is operator error, not host platform.

David



David Smoot
davidsmoot at gmail.com