[yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE meta-ossystems-base, meta-browser YP Compatible

Thu Mar 8 07:09:10 PST 2018


On 03/08/2018 05:25 AM, Mills, William wrote:
>
> Jeffro/Tracy,
>
>  
>
> What is the goal of this list?  Is it just BSP layers?  (I don’t know
> why we would limit it that way). 
>
>  
>
> If it is just BSPs then meta-qt5 should not be listed and
> meta-osssystems-base should not be either.
>
>  
>
> If non-BSP layers should be included (and I think they should be) why
> isn’t meta-browser listed?
>
> Why would meta-arago not be listed? What about the OSV?  I voted for a
> lot of Wind River and Mentor etc products, where does that show up?
>
Is this what you are looking for ?
https://www.yoctoproject.org/software-overview/layers/

- armin

>  
>
> WRT to web presentation it would be great if it was a real table that
> could be sorted by name or release etc but the low tech version of
> that would be to break the release name out as a column and keep the
> table sorted by that with most recent releases listed first. 
>
>  
>
> Bill
>
>  
>
> *From:*Mills, William
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 7, 2018 1:33 PM
> *To:* 'Osier-mixon, Jeffrey'; Erway, Tracey M; Dmytriyenko, Denys
> *Cc:* yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
> *Subject:* RE: [yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE meta-ossystems-base,
> meta-browser YP Compatible
>
>  
>
> This is simply not true.  Meta-ti was submitted everytime we submitted
> meta-arago.
>
> I will have Denys send you the evidence.
>
>  
>
> *From:*Osier-mixon, Jeffrey [mailto:jeffrey.osier-mixon at intel.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 7, 2018 11:54 AM
> *To:* Erway, Tracey M; Mills, William
> *Cc:* yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org>
> *Subject:* RE: [yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE meta-ossystems-base,
> meta-browser YP Compatible
>
>  
>
> I fixed this (in the layer index). I had set the wrong layerbranch to
> have the status.
>
>  
>
> I really wish I could go back and update older releases of everyone’s
> software to YP Compatible. However, the plain truth is that no one
> actually applied for Compatible status for BSP layers. Intel did so as
> part of the release cycle for their BSP. I went back through every
> form I have received since we launched the program in 2012. There have
> been a number of products and distros – including Arago – that have
> been listed over the years, but no one has kept up with submitting BSP
> layers.
>
>  
>
> I do agree that the site would look better if we pulled down the older
> meta-intel layers.
>
>  
>
> Jeffrey “Jefro” Osier-Mixon, Intel Corporation
>
> Open Source Community Manager
>
>  
>
> *From:*yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org
> <mailto:yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org>
> [mailto:yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Erway, Tracey M
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 07, 2018 8:12 AM
> *To:* Mills, William <wmills at ti.com <mailto:wmills at ti.com>>
> *Cc:* yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE meta-ossystems-base,
> meta-browser YP Compatible
>
>  
>
> I’ll take care of it.
>
>
> On Mar 7, 2018, at 7:42 AM, Mills, William <wmills at ti.com
> <mailto:wmills at ti.com>> wrote:
>
>     Tracy,
>
>      
>
>     I assume Jeffro did it, so I also assume he can fix it.
>
>      
>
>     On this page: https://www.yoctoproject.org/software-overview/layers/
>
>     It says:
>
>     meta-ossystems-base
>     version: master
>     <https://code.ossystems.com.br/gitweb?p=meta-ossystems-base.git>
>
>      
>
>     It should say rocko not master.
>
>      
>
>     And while we are talking about it:  which compatibility
>     certifications are we listing?
>
>     Intel has a lot including old releases where everyone else’s older
>     certifications seem to be missing.
>
>     I know TI has more than just the one now listed and I know I have
>     voted for Wind River and Mentor etc etc.
>
>     What is the policy?
>
>      
>
>     Bill
>
>      
>
>     *From:*Erway, Tracey M [mailto:tracey.m.erway at intel.com]
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, March 6, 2018 4:21 PM
>     *To:* Mills, William; Noal, Daniel F (Wind River); Jeff
>     Osier-Mixon; yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
>     <mailto:yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org>
>     *Subject:* RE: [yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE
>     meta-ossystems-base, meta-browser YP Compatible
>
>      
>
>     Bill,
>
>     What specifically should not be listed on the website?  And where
>     on the website?
>
>     /t
>
>      
>
>     *From:*yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org
>     <mailto:yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org>
>     [mailto:yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Mills,
>     William
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, March 06, 2018 1:11 PM
>     *To:* Noal, Daniel F (Wind River) <dan.noal at windriver.com
>     <mailto:dan.noal at windriver.com>>; Jeff Osier-Mixon
>     <jefro at jefro.net <mailto:jefro at jefro.net>>;
>     yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org>
>     *Subject:* Re: [yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE
>     meta-ossystems-base, meta-browser YP Compatible
>
>      
>
>     Jeffro,
>
>      
>
>     Compatibility is against a specific release correct?
>
>     It good to test against master but it should not be listed on the
>     website (as it is now).
>
>      
>
>     What is meta-osssytems-base?  It says it is a BSP layer in the
>     readme but I see no machines and I see things that modify busybox
>     etc.  Is this really a distro layer?  Is it a mix of distro and
>     some bsp?
>
>      
>
>     Bill
>
>      
>
>      
>
>     *From:*yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org
>     <mailto:yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org>
>     [mailto:yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Noal, Dan
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, March 6, 2018 9:44 AM
>     *To:* Jeff Osier-Mixon; yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
>     <mailto:yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org>
>     *Subject:* Re: [yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE
>     meta-ossystems-base, meta-browser YP Compatible
>
>      
>
>     Wind River votes yes.
>
>      
>
>     Dan Noal | Sr. Director, Core Platforms Group
>
>     direct 510.749.2555  mobile 510.710.6691  
>     <image001.png> 
>
>      
>
>     *From:*yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org
>     <mailto:yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org>
>     [mailto:yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Jeff
>     Osier-Mixon
>     *Sent:* Monday, March 05, 2018 10:53 AM
>     *To:* yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org>
>     *Subject:* [yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE meta-ossystems-base,
>     meta-browser YP Compatible
>
>      
>
>     Hi folks - the layers are rolling in! Otavio has submitted
>
>     meta-ossystems-base
>
>     meta-browser
>
>     for YP Compatible. Both have Yes answers throughout the form for
>     all appropriate answers and have been tested on rocko and master.
>
>     Please vote yes/no on these layers. I am granting provisional
>     status while voting commences.
>
>     thanks
>
>
>     -- 
>
>     Jeff Osier-Mixon - Open Source Community Strategist, Intel Corporation
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto-ab/attachments/20180308/312acfa9/attachment-0001.html>