[yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE meta-ossystems-base, meta-browser YP Compatible
Denys Dmytriyenko
denys at ti.com
Wed Mar 7 11:20:07 PST 2018
Jefro,
I've been submitting both meta-ti BSP and meta-arago Distro layers for
compatibility status since the beginning of the program in 2012.
Our list of YP compatible badges is as follows:
meta-ti - 1.3 (Danny), 1.4 (Dylan), 1.5 (Dora), 1.6 (Daisy), 1.8 (Fido)
meta-arago - 1.3 (Danny), 1.4 (Dylan), 1.5 (Dora), 1.6 (Daisy)
After Fido we started productizing only 1 release a year, plus I was told to
hold off submitting new releases and to wait for YP Compatible 2.0 program.
Unfortunately, it took longer to get here, hence the gap since 1.8. Looks like
others were still submitting under the old program. We could have submitted
for 2.1 (Krogoth) and 2.2 (Morty), but basically we missed 2016 releases...
I'll try to dig for corresponding emails/communications for submissions and/or
reviews. If there were AB votings, it could be possible to look for those in
the archives as well...
--
Denys
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 01:33:05PM -0500, Mills, William wrote:
> This is simply not true. Meta-ti was submitted everytime we submitted
> meta-arago.
>
> I will have Denys send you the evidence.
>
>
>
> From: Osier-mixon, Jeffrey [mailto:jeffrey.osier-mixon at intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 11:54 AM
> To: Erway, Tracey M; Mills, William
> Cc: yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: RE: [yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE meta-ossystems-base,
> meta-browser YP Compatible
>
>
>
> I fixed this (in the layer index). I had set the wrong layerbranch to have
> the status.
>
>
>
> I really wish I could go back and update older releases of everyone's
> software to YP Compatible. However, the plain truth is that no one
> actually applied for Compatible status for BSP layers. Intel did so as
> part of the release cycle for their BSP. I went back through every form I
> have received since we launched the program in 2012. There have been a
> number of products and distros - including Arago - that have been listed
> over the years, but no one has kept up with submitting BSP layers.
>
>
>
> I do agree that the site would look better if we pulled down the older
> meta-intel layers.
>
>
>
> Jeffrey "Jefro" Osier-Mixon, Intel Corporation
>
> Open Source Community Manager
>
>
>
> From: yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org
> [mailto:yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Erway, Tracey M
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 8:12 AM
> To: Mills, William <wmills at ti.com>
> Cc: yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE meta-ossystems-base,
> meta-browser YP Compatible
>
>
>
> I'll take care of it.
>
> On Mar 7, 2018, at 7:42 AM, Mills, William <wmills at ti.com> wrote:
>
> Tracy,
>
>
>
> I assume Jeffro did it, so I also assume he can fix it.
>
>
>
> On this page: https://www.yoctoproject.org/software-overview/layers/
>
> It says:
>
> meta-ossystems-base
> version: master
>
>
>
> It should say rocko not master.
>
>
>
> And while we are talking about it: which compatibility certifications
> are we listing?
>
> Intel has a lot including old releases where everyone else's older
> certifications seem to be missing.
>
> I know TI has more than just the one now listed and I know I have voted
> for Wind River and Mentor etc etc.
>
> What is the policy?
>
>
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> From: Erway, Tracey M [mailto:tracey.m.erway at intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 4:21 PM
> To: Mills, William; Noal, Daniel F (Wind River); Jeff Osier-Mixon;
> yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: RE: [yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE meta-ossystems-base,
> meta-browser YP Compatible
>
>
>
> Bill,
>
> What specifically should not be listed on the website? And where on the
> website?
>
> /t
>
>
>
> From: yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org
> [mailto:yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Mills, William
> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 1:11 PM
> To: Noal, Daniel F (Wind River) <dan.noal at windriver.com>; Jeff
> Osier-Mixon <jefro at jefro.net>; yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE meta-ossystems-base,
> meta-browser YP Compatible
>
>
>
> Jeffro,
>
>
>
> Compatibility is against a specific release correct?
>
> It good to test against master but it should not be listed on the
> website (as it is now).
>
>
>
> What is meta-osssytems-base? It says it is a BSP layer in the readme
> but I see no machines and I see things that modify busybox etc. Is this
> really a distro layer? Is it a mix of distro and some bsp?
>
>
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
>
> From: yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org
> [mailto:yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Noal, Dan
> Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 9:44 AM
> To: Jeff Osier-Mixon; yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE meta-ossystems-base,
> meta-browser YP Compatible
>
>
>
> Wind River votes yes.
>
>
>
> Dan Noal | Sr. Director, Core Platforms Group
>
> direct 510.749.2555 mobile 510.710.6691
> <image001.png>
>
>
>
> From: yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org
> [mailto:yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Osier-Mixon
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2018 10:53 AM
> To: yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: [yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE meta-ossystems-base,
> meta-browser YP Compatible
>
>
>
> Hi folks - the layers are rolling in! Otavio has submitted
>
> meta-ossystems-base
>
> meta-browser
>
> for YP Compatible. Both have Yes answers throughout the form for all
> appropriate answers and have been tested on rocko and master.
>
> Please vote yes/no on these layers. I am granting provisional status
> while voting commences.
>
> thanks
>
> --
>
> Jeff Osier-Mixon - Open Source Community Strategist, Intel Corporation
More information about the yocto-ab
mailing list