[yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE meta-ti BSP layer YP Compatible

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:42:10PM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> I can push a workaround I mentioned below to meta-ti, but it won't completely 
> eliminate all the signature differences I mentioned - both DEFAULTTUNE and 
> eudev. We either need to fix the script or have a more detailed guidelines.

And the workaround is now in.
bitbake-diffsigs still reports differences in eudev do_install and 
do_populate_sysroot between TI and non-TI machines...


> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 01:34:00PM -0800, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
> > I assume this is a minor issue that can be worked out, so I am not
> > suspending voting at this time. If anyone else can jump in to test, it
> > would be appreciated.
> > 
> > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:30 PM, akuster <akuster at mvista.com> wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > > So what now? Is the voting on hold?
> > >
> > > -armin
> > >
> > >
> > > On 03/05/2018 11:50 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:25:20PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 4:12 PM, akuster <akuster at mvista.com> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 03/05/2018 10:48 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis at denix.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> FWIW, just tried with distroless setup - only oe-core and meta-ti and
> > > still
> > > >>> get a PASS.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Did you test with qemuarm?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The current explanation in the dev-manual does not make that a
> > > requirement
> > > >>> for the Yocto-check-layer to be run. If it is unclear, then we need to
> > > >>> update doc's or clarify things in the docs.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  If the script is mis-behaving, then please open a bug.
> > > >> A BSP layer cannot change other machines, so it implies that a non-BSP
> > > >> machine must be tested against.
> > > > So, this eudev.bbappend, you are so adamant about, adds couple files to
> > > > SRC_URI, which are not patches, just extra rule files, so the source
> > > doesn't
> > > > change. They are also not installed by default, they are only installed
> > > on TI
> > > > machines...
> > > >
> > > > Ok, running bitbake-diffsigs manually to emulate your error condition, I
> > > get
> > > > this signature difference. Now, changing SRC_URI to only add those 2
> > > files
> > > > for TI machines, so for anything else it would pretty much result in an
> > > empty
> > > > bbappend. And guess what? It still reports the same signature difference!
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > yocto-ab mailing list
> > > yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
> > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto-ab
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jeff Osier-Mixon - Open Source Community Strategist, Intel Corporation