[yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE YP Compatible, Angstrom/YP 1.7

[akuster]

Yes from MontaVista.

sorry, sleeping at the wheel this week.

  -armin

On 07/24/2015 12:08 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
> Hi all - this is a simple update for the Angstrom release to be YP
> Compatible vs. YP 1.7. Angstrom has been a YP Compatible project for
> several years. Please vote yes/no
>
> thanks
>
>     --Contact information--
>       Organization: The Angstrom Distribution
>       Project name: The Angstrom Distribution
>       Contact name: Koen Kooi
>       Contact email address: koen at dominion.thruhere.net
>       URL to organization or product link:
>       http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/
>       Registration date: 2015-07-18
>       Compliance Agreement revision: 1.0
>       Yocto Project Compatible Version: 1.7
>
>
> Acceptance Criteria:
>    - Working towards and supporting the aims and objectives of the Yocto
> Project. These include decreasing the fragmentation of embedded ecosystem
> and
> focus around a common shared set of tools, formats and best practices. We
> want to avoid multiple groups of people repeating the same work and have one
> set of great tools rather than multiple tools with drawbacks.: Yes
>    - Promoting the OpenEmbedded architecture, layer model, and BSP
> format.:Yes
>    - Making visible contributions in the OpenEmbedded and component
> projectsof
> the Yocto Project. Please describe your participation in the comments
> section
> below.: Yes
>    - Are all your publicly accessible layers listed in the OpenEmbedded
> Layers
> index (http://layers.openembedded.org)?: Yes
>    - Be a non-profit, or member of the Yocto Project working group,
> regardless
> of organization size, or if the project's parent organization is an
> open-source project.: Yes
>    - If the project includes build system functionality, are BitBake and
> OpenEmbedded-Core included as components?: No (explain below)
>    - If present, can the directories containing BitBake and OpenEmbedded-Core
> be clearly identified within the system and only contain those components?:
> No (explain below)
>    - Have all patches applied to BitBake and OpenEmbedded-Core (if present)
> been submitted to the open source community?: Yes
>    - Do all layers contain a README file which details the origin of
> thelayer,
> its maintainer, where to submit changes, and any dependencies or version
> requirements?: Yes
>    - Do all layers build without errors against OpenEmbedded-Core with
> onlythe
> dependencies/requirements listed in their README file?: Yes
>    - (For BSPs) Does the layer follow the format defined in the Yocto Project
> Board Support Package (BSP) Developers Guide?: Yes
>    - Are hardware support, configuration (distro) policy, and recipe metadata
> separated into different layers which do not depend on each other?: Yes
>    - Is a test report document included showing which combinations of layers,
> recipes, and machines have been tested?: Yes
>    - If any item in the "Yocto Project Compatible Compliance Recommendations"
> list is not true, is this documented in the testing report?: Yes
> Recommendations:
>    - Linux kernels are either based around LTSI kernel versions or a Yocto
> Project kernel version.: No (explain below)
>    - Everything builds successfully with the standard toolchain from OE-Core,
> where the architecture is one supported by OE-Core as standard. This is to
> ensure that your layers are compatible with OE-Core. It is not required that
> the OE-Core toolchain be provided to customers or any downstream projects.:
> Yes
> Explanation: As mentioned in the previous registrations, this is a distro
> layer, so no embedded bitbake or OE-core, no kernels, etc.
>
>
>