[yocto-ab] Form submission from: Yocto Project Compatible Registration

David Nyström David.Nystrom at enea.com
Tue May 6 12:46:05 PDT 2014


Yes from Enea.

Br,
David

Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)


-----Original Message-----
From: Osier-mixon, Jeffrey [jeffrey.osier-mixon at intel.com]
Received: Monday, 05 May 2014, 20:25
To: Ta, Lieu [Lieu.Ta at windriver.com]
CC: Yocto Project [webmaster at yoctoproject.org]; yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org [yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org]
Subject: Re: [yocto-ab] Form submission from: Yocto Project Compatible  Registration


Hi all - if you have not yet voted on Arago, please do so. I only have
4 officially confirmed votes. (Remember that Silvers only comprise one
vote in total)

thanks

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Ta, Lieu <Lieu.Ta at windriver.com> wrote:
> Yes from Wind River
>
>
> Regards,
> Lieu
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-ab-bounces at yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Osier-mixon, Jeffrey
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 12:41 PM
> To: akuster at mvista
> Cc: Yocto Project; yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [yocto-ab] Form submission from: Yocto Project Compatible Registration
>
> I love it that you guys are voting before I even call for a vote :)
>
> All - please vote to upgrade the Arago YP Compatible status from 1.4 to 1.5
>
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:35 PM, akuster at mvista <akuster at mvista.com> wrote:
>> On 4/24/14, 12:17 PM, Yocto Project wrote:
>>
>> Yes on behalf of MontaVista.
>>
>> - Armin
>>
>>
>>> Submitted on Thursday, April 24, 2014 - 12:17 Submitted by anonymous
>>> user: [71.191.205.189] Submitted values are:
>>>
>>>     --Contact information--
>>>       Organization: Texas Instruments
>>>       Project name: The Arago Project
>>>       Contact name: Denys Dmytriyenko
>>>       Contact email address: denys at ti.com
>>>       URL to organization or product link: http://arago-project.org
>>>       Registration date: 2014-04-24
>>>       Compliance Agreement revision: 1.0
>>>       Yocto Project Compatible Version: 1.5
>>>
>>>
>>> Acceptance Criteria:
>>>    - Working towards and supporting the aims and objectives of the
>>> Yocto Project. These include decreasing the fragmentation of embedded
>>> ecosystem and focus around a common shared set of tools, formats and
>>> best practices. We want to avoid multiple groups of people repeating
>>> the same work and have one set of great tools rather than multiple
>>> tools with drawbacks.: Yes
>>>    - Promoting the OpenEmbedded architecture, layer model, and BSP
>>> format.: Yes
>>>    - Making visible contributions in the OpenEmbedded and component
>>> projects of the Yocto Project.: Yes
>>>    - Be a non-profit, or member of the Yocto Project working group,
>>> regardless of organization size, or if the project's parent
>>> organization is an open-source project.: Yes
>>>    - If the project includes build system functionality, are BitBake
>>> and OpenEmbedded-Core included as components?: Yes
>>>    - If present, can the directories containing BitBake and
>>> OpenEmbedded-Core be clearly identified within the system and only
>>> contain those
>>> components?:
>>> Yes
>>>    - Have all patches applied to BitBake and OpenEmbedded-Core (if
>>> present)
>>> been submitted to the open source community?: Yes
>>>    - Do all layers contain a README file which details the origin of
>>> the layer, its maintainer, where to submit changes, and any
>>> dependencies or version
>>> requirements?: Yes
>>>    - Do all layers build without errors against OpenEmbedded-Core
>>> with only the dependencies/requirements listed in their README file?:
>>> Yes
>>>    - (For BSPs) Does the layer follow the format defined in the Yocto
>>> Project Board Support Package (BSP) Developers Guide?: Yes
>>>    - Are hardware support, configuration (distro) policy, and recipe
>>> metadata separated into different layers which do not depend on each
>>> other?: Yes
>>>    - Is a test report document included showing which combinations of
>>> layers, recipes, and machines have been tested?: Yes
>>>    - If any item in the "Yocto Project Compatible Compliance
>>> Recommendations"
>>> list is not true, is this documented in the testing report?: Yes
>>> Recommendations:
>>>    - Linux kernels are either based around LTSI kernel versions or a
>>> Yocto Project kernel version.: No (explain below)
>>>    - Everything builds successfully with the standard toolchain from
>>> OE-Core, where the architecture is one supported by OE-Core as
>>> standard. This is to ensure that your layers are compatible with
>>> OE-Core. It is not required that the OE-Core toolchain be provided to
>>> customers or any downstream
>>> projects.:
>>> Yes
>>> Explanation: Linux kernels used in meta-ti are either latest staging
>>> work-in-progress or aligned with Long-Term Stable from GregKH as much
>>> as possible.
>>>
>>>
>>> The results of this submission may be viewed at:
>>> https://www.yoctoproject.org/node/351547/submission/93
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Osier-Mixon @Intel
> Yocto Project Community Manager http://yoctoproject.org
> --
> _______________________________________________
> yocto-ab mailing list
> yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto-ab



--
Jeff Osier-Mixon @Intel
Yocto Project Community Manager http://yoctoproject.org
--
_______________________________________________
yocto-ab mailing list
yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto-ab



More information about the yocto-ab mailing list