[yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE Compatible for meta-fsl-arm

[akuster@mvista]

On 5/6/14, 7:30 AM, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey wrote:

With "Arm" in the name, how can I say no ; )

Yes on behalf of MontaVista

- Armin

> Hi all - please vote yes/no on updating meta-fsl-arm as YP Compatible
> from v1.5 to 1.6. This layer has been YP Compatible for some time now
> already - this is just an update.
>
> thanks
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Yocto Project <webmaster at yoctoproject.org>
> Date: Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:53 AM
> Subject: [yocto-ab] Form submission from: Yocto Project Compatible Registration
> To: yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
>
>
> Submitted on Monday, May 5, 2014 - 11:53
> Submitted by anonymous user: [177.194.208.225]
> Submitted values are:
>
>     --Contact information--
>       Organization: O.S. Systems Software LTDA
>       Project name: meta-fsl-arm
>       Contact name: Otavio Salvador
>       Contact email address: otavio at ossystems.com.br
>       URL to organization or product link: http://www.ossystems.com.br
>       Registration date: 2014-05-05
>       Compliance Agreement revision: 1.0
>       Yocto Project Compatible Version: 1.6
>
>
> Acceptance Criteria:
>    - Working towards and supporting the aims and objectives of the Yocto
> Project. These include decreasing the fragmentation of embedded ecosystem and
> focus around a common shared set of tools, formats and best practices. We
> want to avoid multiple groups of people repeating the same work and have one
> set of great tools rather than multiple tools with drawbacks.: Yes
>    - Promoting the OpenEmbedded architecture, layer model, and BSP format.:Yes
>    - Making visible contributions in the OpenEmbedded and component projectsof
> the Yocto Project.: Yes
>    - Be a non-profit, or member of the Yocto Project working group, regardless
> of organization size, or if the project's parent organization is an
> open-source project.: Yes
>    - If the project includes build system functionality, are BitBake and
> OpenEmbedded-Core included as components?: Yes
>    - If present, can the directories containing BitBake and OpenEmbedded-Core
> be clearly identified within the system and only contain those components?:
> Yes
>    - Have all patches applied to BitBake and OpenEmbedded-Core (if present)
> been submitted to the open source community?: Yes
>    - Do all layers contain a README file which details the origin of thelayer,
> its maintainer, where to submit changes, and any dependencies or version
> requirements?: Yes
>    - Do all layers build without errors against OpenEmbedded-Core with onlythe
> dependencies/requirements listed in their README file?: Yes
>    - (For BSPs) Does the layer follow the format defined in the Yocto Project
> Board Support Package (BSP) Developers Guide?: Yes
>    - Are hardware support, configuration (distro) policy, and recipe metadata
> separated into different layers which do not depend on each other?: Yes
>    - Is a test report document included showing which combinations of layers,
> recipes, and machines have been tested?: Yes
>    - If any item in the "Yocto Project Compatible Compliance Recommendations"
> list is not true, is this documented in the testing report?: Yes
> Recommendations:
>    - Linux kernels are either based around LTSI kernel versions or a Yocto
> Project kernel version.: Yes
>    - Everything builds successfully with the standard toolchain from OE-Core,
> where the architecture is one supported by OE-Core as standard. This is to
> ensure that your layers are compatible with OE-Core. It is not required that
> the OE-Core toolchain be provided to customers or any downstream projects.:
> Yes
> Explanation:
>
>
> The results of this submission may be viewed at:
> https://www.yoctoproject.org/node/351547/submission/94
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> yocto-ab mailing list
> yocto-ab at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto-ab
>
>