[yocto-ab] YP Advisory Board: VOTE MontaVista CGL 7 - Compatible, YP 1.4

[Jeff Osier-Mixon]

Thanks for noting this. Yes, that term should say Yocto Project
instead. The term "Yocto Compliance" is not currently meaningful in
the YP world - we have a "compliance program" that I would like to
rename, but there is no "compliance" status. I have sent a note to MV.

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Otavio Salvador
<otavio at ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon <jefro at jefro.net> wrote:
>> Hi all - please vote for member organization MontaVista, who is
>> seeking YP Compatible status for MontaVista Carrier Grade Linux 7.0.
>> This is for Compatible status with YP 1.4, which they plan to update
>> sometime soon.
>>
>> website: http://mvista.com/product-carrier-grade-edition7.html
>
> In the website it is said:
>
> Yocto Compliance
>
> two remarks here:
>
> Yocto Project would be the right writing, correct?
>
> Compliance? We didn't vote yet so it is not yet YP Compatible. Or CGL
> 7 is 1.3 compatible?
>
> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750



-- 
Jeff Osier-Mixon @Intel
Yocto Project Community Manager http://yoctoproject.org